Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Abstract
In conditionally automated driving, a vehicle issues a take-over request when it reaches the functional limits of self-driving, and the driver must take control. The key driving parameters affecting the quality of the take-over (TO) process have yet to be determined and are the motivation for our work. To determine these parameters, we used a dataset of 41 driving and non-driving parameters from a previous user study with 216 TOs while performing a non-driving-related task on a handheld device in a driving simulator. Eight take-over quality aspects, grouped into pre-TO predictors (attention), during-TO predictors (reaction time, solution suitability), and safety performance (off-road drive, braking, lateral acceleration, time to collision, success), were modeled using multiple linear regression, support vector machines, M5’, 1R, logistic regression, and J48. We interpreted the best-suited models by highlighting the most influential parameters that affect the overall quality of a TO. The results show that these are primarily maximal acceleration (88.6% accurate prediction of collisions) and the TOR-to-first-brake interval. Gradual braking, neither too hard nor too soft, as fast as possible seems to be the strategy that maximizes the overall TO quality. The position of the handheld device and the way it was held prior to TO did not affect TO quality. However, handling the device during TO did affect driver attention when shorter attention times were observed and drivers held their mobile phones in only one hand. In the future, automatic gradual braking maneuvers could be considered instead of immediate full TOs.
Funder
Slovenian Research Agency
European Union’s Horizon 2020
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference106 articles.
1. Who Benefits from AVs? Equity Implications of Automated Vehicles Policies in Full-Scale Prototype Cities;Oke;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.,2021
2. Factors That Influence Parents’ Intentions of Using Autonomous Vehicles to Transport Children to and from School;Jing;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2021
3. Integration of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs) into Existing Transportation Services: A Focus Group Study;Kermanshachi;Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect.,2021
4. Public Concerns and Connected and Automated Vehicles: Safety, Privacy, and Data Security;Lee;Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun,2022
5. Polydoropoulou, A., Tsouros, I., Thomopoulos, N., Pronello, C., Elvarsson, A., Sigþórsson, H., Dadashzadeh, N., Stojmenova, K., Sodnik, J., and Neophytou, S. (2021). Who Is Willing to Share Their AV? Insights about Gender Differences among Seven Countries. Sustainability, 13.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献