Impact of Chainsaw Power on Fuel and Oil Consumption
-
Published:2023-02-03
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:2795
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Antonić Slavica1, Danilović Milorad1, Stojnić Dušan1ORCID, Dražić Srđan2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2. The Public Enterprise “Šume Republike Srpske” a.d. Sokolac, Research Develop and Project Center, Grčka 21, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Abstract
This research was carried out in a selection stand of beech and fir, where logging was performed with chainsaws of different powers. Two chainsaws of 3.9 kW were used for work on one area, while on the other one the applied tools were a combination of a smaller and a larger saw (2.5 kW and 3.9 kW). After logging, the consumption of energy products (fuel (gasoline and motor oil mix ratio 50:1) and chainsaw oil) was measured for each individual chainsaw by the method of refueling. It was found that the power of the chainsaw, i.e., the combination of chainsaws of different powers, significantly influences the consumption of energy products in a beech–fir mixed stand. By using a combination of one larger and one smaller chainsaw instead of two larger chainsaws, savings of about 26% for fuel and 24% for oil were achieved. The prediction analysis found that by using two chainsaws (of lower and higher power) instead of two higher power chainsaws (currently common mode of work) in beech stands for an estimated volume of about 1 million m3 year−1, the savings could be about 54,000 L of fuel and about 19,000 L of oil. In monetary value, this is a saving of about EUR 120,000 year−1, i.e., of about 2,500,000 MJ year−1 of energy.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference35 articles.
1. Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] (2021, July 15). Forestry Production and Trade. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO/visualize. 2. Timber Harvesting Methods in Eastern European Countries: A Review;Moskalik;Croat. J. For. Eng.,2017 3. Landekić, M., Martinić, I., Mijoč, D., Bakarić, M., and Šporčić, M. (2021). Injury Patterns among Forestry Workers in Croatia. Forests, 12. 4. Danilović, M., and Ćuprić, N. (2010, January 11–13). The state of forests in Serbia in terms of their utilization. Proceedings of the First Serbian Forestry Congress—Future with Forests, Belgrade, Serbia. 5. Spiecker, H., Hansen, J., Klimo, E., Skovsgaard, J.P., Sterba, H., and Von Teuffel, K. (2004). Norway Spruce Conversion-Options and Consequences, Brill. European Forest Institute Research Report 18.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|