Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Ethology and Animal Welfare (LEBA), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy
2. Independent Researcher, Via IV novembre 13, 52044 Camucia, Italy
3. School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, Camerino University, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, Italy
Abstract
As livestock production grows to satisfy the global demand for animal products, understanding public attitudes towards different husbandry systems becomes essential for both animal welfare and socio-economic reasons. This study aimed to investigate people’s emotional responses toward pictures of farm animals kept in intensive and extensive husbandry systems, their perception of animal welfare, and their choices as animal product consumers. A questionnaire that included demographic questions and photos of cows, pigs, chickens, and rabbits in both intensive and extensive systems was distributed electronically and physically and completed by 835 respondents. Photos of animals in intensive systems elicited more negative emotions, especially for pigs and rabbits (p < 0.05), as opposed to extensive systems, which elicited more positive emotions, especially for chickens (p < 0.001). Higher welfare levels were perceived for extensively farmed animals (p < 0.001) and for cattle compared to all other species, regardless of the husbandry system (p < 0.001). The quality of the emotional response was positively associated with welfare perception (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with the importance given to welfare when purchasing animal products (p < 0.001). Finally, the emotional response was found to be affected by gender, education, household composition, living area, pet ownership, and eating habits. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
Reference95 articles.
1. Willer, H., Travnicek, J., Meier, C., and Schlatter, B. (2021). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics & Emerging Trends 2021, FiBL & IFOAM.
2. Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., and Lomillos, J.M. (2020). Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals, 10.
3. Farm Animal Welfare: Beyond “Natural” Behavior;Dawkins;Science,2023
4. The Impact of Different Housing Systems on Health and Welfare of Grower and Finisher Pigs in Switzerland;Cagienard;Prev. Veter Med.,2005
5. Stocking Density Effects on Growth Performance and Processing Yields of Heavy Broilers;Dozier;Poult. Sci.,2005