Development of an Interprofessional Psychosocial Interventions Framework

Author:

Branjerdporn Grace1ORCID,Gillespie Kerri Marie12,Dymond Alex1,Reyes Neil Josen Delos1,Robertson Julia1ORCID,Almeida-Crasto Alice1,Bethi Shailendhra1

Affiliation:

1. Mental Health and Specialist Services, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast 4215, Australia

2. School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove 4059, Australia

Abstract

To meet the increasingly complex needs of mental health consumers, it is essential for multidisciplinary clinicians to have capabilities across a range of psychosocial interventions. Despite this, there is scant evidence investigating the existing levels of knowledge and skills of specialties within multidisciplinary mental health teams. The purpose of this paper was to describe the self-reported capabilities of mental health clinicians, and to provide a rationale for the Psychosocial Interventions Framework Assessment (PIFA), which aims to enhance the access to, and quality of, evidence-informed practice for consumers of mental health services (MHSs) by strengthening workforce capabilities and leadership for psychosocial therapies. Using the Delphi method, the team developed a 75-item survey based on the 10-point Mental Health Recovery Star (MHRS). Participants completed a self-administered survey indicating their perceived capabilities in the PIFA items. The findings revealed lower-than-expected average scores between ‘novice’ and ‘proficient’, highlighting the need for further development of specific training and education modules for individual teams. This is the first framework of its nature to use the Recovery StarTM to determine the psychosocial areas and domains for the assessment of practitioners’ strengths and needs for skill development.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference64 articles.

1. Multidisciplinary team functioning and decision making within forensic mental health;Haines;Ment. Health Rev. J.,2018

2. Victorian Government Department of Health (2013). National Practice Standards for the Mental Health Workforce 2013.

3. Australian Association of Social Workers (2014). Practice Standards for Mental Health Social Workers 2014, AASW.

4. Australian and New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders (2022, November 05). ANZAED Practice Standards. Available online: https://www.anzaed.org.au/anzaed-practice-standards/.

5. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010;Whiteford;Lancet,2013

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3