Abstract
The evaluation of ecological sustainability is significant for high-quality urban development and scientific management and regulation. Taking the Chengdu urban agglomeration (CUA) as the research object, this paper combined the three-dimensional ecological footprint model (3DEF) and random forest to evaluate the ecological sustainability of the study area and identify the influencing factors. The study results indicate that: (1) From 2000 to 2019, the ecological sustainability of Chengdu urban agglomeration was divided into four types, and the overall ecological sustainability of this region showed a downward trend. The areas with higher ecological sustainability were mainly distributed in the northern part of the urban agglomeration (Mianyang City) and the southern part (Leshan City and Ya’an City), while the cities in the central region (Chengdu City, Meishan City, and Ziyang City) had lower ecological sustainability. (2) The main factors affecting the ecological sustainability of urban agglomerations are industrial wastewater discharge, industrial smoke (powder) dust discharge, and green coverage of built-up areas, followed by urbanization and population size. Through this study, we have two meaningful findings: (a) Our research method in this paper provides a new way to study the factors affecting the ecological sustainability of urban agglomerations. (b) The results of the identification of influencing factors might be the reference for urban environmental infrastructure construction and urban planning.
Funder
National Social Science Fund of China: “Ecological Importance and Supporting Policies of Ecological Functional Areas in Key Urban Clusters in China”
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference53 articles.
1. Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China;Zhang;J. Environ. Manag.,2008
2. Evaluation of ecological sustainability based on a revised three-dimensional ecological footprint model in Shandong Province China;Xun;Sci. Total Environ.,2019
3. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out;Rees;Environ. Urban.,1992
4. Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological Footprint and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: A Tool for Planning Toward Sustainability, University of British Columbia.
5. Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.E. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, New Society Publishers.