TLIF Online Videos for Patient Education—Evaluation of Comprehensiveness, Quality, and Reliability

Author:

Heisinger Stephan1,Huber Dominikus2,Matzner Michael P.1,Hiertz Helmut3,Lampe Lukas Peter4,Zagata Jakob5,Aspalter Stefan6,Radl Christian6,Senker Wolfgang6ORCID,Mair Georg7,Grohs Josef G.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

2. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

3. Division of Neurosurgery, Medical Health Centre Bad Vigaun, 5424 Bad Vigaun, Austria

4. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinik Landstraße, 1030 Vienna, Austria

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, 4020 Linz, Austria

7. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hanusch Hospital of OEGK, 1140 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the number of lumbar interbody fusion surgeries performed has been constantly increasing, with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) being one of the most common surgical techniques. Due to easy accessibility, patients frequently use YouTube to obtain information on health-related issues. Consequently, online video platforms may be a valuable tool for patient education. The aim of this study was to assess the quality, reliability, and comprehensiveness of online videos on TLIF. We screened 180 videos on YouTube, yielding a total of 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria. These videos were evaluated using Global Quality Scale, DISCERN reliability tool, and JAMA Benchmark Score, and assessed in regard to their comprehensiveness and coverage of relevant aspects. At the time of rating, the videos had between 9188 and 1,530,408 views and between 0 and 3344 likes. The median rater assessment for all videos was “moderate quality”. GQS and subjective grades showed a moderate to strong statistically significant association with views and likes. Considering this association of GQS and subjective grade with views and likes, these criteria could be used by laypersons to identify good-quality content. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for peer-reviewed content that covers all of the relevant aspects.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3