Beyond Information Provision: Analysis of the Roles of Structure and Agency in COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Ethnic Minority Communities

Author:

Poduval Shoba1ORCID,Kamal Atiya2ORCID,Martin Sam34ORCID,Islam Amin5,Kaviraj Chandrika5,Gill Paramjit6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UCL Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK

2. School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, 4 Cardigan Street, Birmingham B4 7BD, UK

3. Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), Charles Bell House, 43–45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TY, UK

4. Vaccines and Society Unit, Oxford Vaccine Group, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK

5. Patient and Public Involvement Authors, UCL Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK

6. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Abstract

People from Black and Asian backgrounds are more likely to die from COVID-19 but less likely to be vaccinated, threatening to exacerbate health inequalities already experienced by ethnic minority groups. The literature suggests that mistrust rooted in structural inequality (including socioeconomic position and experience of racism) may be a key barrier to COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Understanding and addressing structural inequality is likely to lead to longer-term impacts than information alone. The aim of this study is to draw on health and sociological theories of structure and agency to inform our understanding of how structural factors influence vaccine confidence. We conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with 22 people from London and the surrounding areas from December 2021 to March 2022. Fourteen participants were members of the public from ethnic minority backgrounds, and seven were professionals working with the public to address concerns and encourage vaccine uptake. Our findings suggest that people from ethnic minority backgrounds make decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination based on a combination of how they experience external social structures (including lack of credibility and clarity from political authority, neglect by health services, and structural racism) and internal processes (weighing up COVID-19 vaccine harms and benefits and concerns about vaccine development and deployment). We may be able to support knowledge accumulation through the provision of reliable and accessible information, particularly through primary and community care, but we recommend a number of changes to research, policy and practice that address structural inequalities. These include working with communities to improve ethnicity data collection, increasing funding allocation to health conditions where ethnic minority communities experience poorer outcomes, greater transparency and public engagement in the vaccine development process, and culturally adapted research recruitment processes.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

UCL Biomedical Research Centre starter grant

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference59 articles.

1. NHS England (2020). COVID-19 Vaccination Deployment Strategy and Operational Readiness.

2. Office for National Statistics (2023, August 18). Coronavirus and Vaccination Rates in Adults by Socio-Demographic Characteristic and Occupation, England: December 2020 to March 2023, Available online: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthinequalities/bulletins/coronavirusandvaccinationratesinadultsbysociodemographiccharacteristicandoccupationengland/december2020tomarch2023#sociodemographic-characteristics.

3. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants;MacDonald;Vaccine,2015

4. World Health Organization (2014). Report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy.

5. Office for National Statistics (2021). Coronavirus and Vaccine Hesitancy, Great Britain: 13 January to 7 February 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3