Effect of Non-Pharmacological Methods in the Reduction of Neonatal Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

García-Valdivieso Inmaculada1ORCID,Yáñez-Araque Benito2ORCID,Moncunill-Martínez Eva3ORCID,Bocos-Reglero M. Jesús4,Gómez-Cantarino Sagrario5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. General Hospital Mancha Centre (HGMC), Castilla-La Mancha Health Service (SESCAM), 13600 Alcázar de San Juan, Spain

2. Department of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo Campus, 45071 Toledo, Spain

3. Toledo University Hospital (HUT), Neonatal and Pediatric Oncology, Castilla-La Mancha Health Service (SESCAM), Theoretical Collaborator University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo Campus, 45071 Toledo, Spain

4. National Hospital of Paraplegics (HNP), Castilla-La Mancha Health Service (SESCAM), Theoretical Collaborator University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo Campus, 45071 Toledo, Spain

5. Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo Campus, 45071 Toledo, Spain

Abstract

In neonatology, neonates have traditionally been considered incapable of feeling pain, due to the immaturity of their nervous system. Currently, there is sufficient information on the perception of pain in neonates; however, this treatment at this crucial stage for development requires a better approach. For this reason, the aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of non-pharmacological analgesia interventions during heel prick, and to assess their effects on heart rate (HR), premature infant pain profile (PIPP) and O2 saturation. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), and the Cochrane collaboration handbook. The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Science Direct were searched until the end of January 2022. The DerSimonian and Laird methods were used to estimate the effect size with a 95% confidence interval (CI95%). Effect size estimates were 0.05 (95% CI: −0.19, 0.29) for HR, −0.02 (95% CI: −0.24, 0.21) for PIPP scale, and −0.12 (95% CI: −0.29, 0.05) for O2 saturation. The non-pharmacological interventions analysed (breastfeeding, kangaroo-mother care method, oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking) were not statistically significant in reducing neonatal pain, but did influence the decrease in pain score and a faster stabilisation of vital signs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference63 articles.

1. Pain in preterm infants: Different perspectives;Obeidat;J. Perinat. Educ.,2021

2. Neonatal pain: A journey spanning three decades;Johnston;Paediatr. Neonatal Pain,2020

3. The development of pain circuits and unique effects of neonatal injury;Brewer;J. Neural Transm.,2020

4. Neonatal pain perceptions and current practice;Perry;Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. N. Am.,2018

5. Impact of repeated procedural pain related stress in infants born very preterm;Vinall;Pediatr. Res.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3