The Impact of Culture-, Health- and Nature-Based Engagement on Mitigating the Adverse Effects of Public Health Restrictions on Wellbeing, Social Connectedness and Loneliness during COVID-19: Quantitative Evidence from a Smaller- and Larger-Scale UK Survey

Author:

Thomson Linda J. M.12ORCID,Spiro Neta34ORCID,Williamon Aaron34,Chatterjee Helen J.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UCL Arts & Sciences, University College London, London WC1 6BT, UK

2. UCL Biosciences, University College London, London WC1 6BT, UK

3. Centre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London SW7 2BS, UK

4. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Abstract

Numerous UK surveys conducted during COVID-19 examined the pandemic’s detrimental effects on health, and the consequences of lockdown and other public health restrictions on mental health. Some surveys considered specific populations and social inequities exacerbated during COVID-19. Fewer surveys examined the ways in which the adverse effects of public health restrictions, such as lockdown, shielding and social distancing, might be alleviated. Drawing upon self-determination theory, the purpose of the current study was to assess whether culture-, health- and nature-based engagement would mitigate the effects of these restrictions on psychological wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness. Quantitative data from a smaller-scale survey (n = 312) and a subset of questions embedded in a larger-scale survey (n = 3647) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Frequency of engagement, whether participation was online or offline and with or without other people, and the extent to which type of participation was associated with psychological wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness were examined. Sports and fitness, gardening and reading occurred frequently in both surveys. For the smaller-scale survey, increases in connectedness and frequency of participation and decreases in loneliness were significantly associated with improved wellbeing, whereas the type of participation and age range were not significant predictors. Outcomes from the smaller-scale survey approximated the larger-scale survey for measures of loneliness, type and frequency of participation and proportion of respondents in each age range. As the frequency of participation was a significant predictor of wellbeing, but the type of participation was not significant, the findings implied that any type of participation in a sufficient quantity would be likely to boost wellbeing.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council/UK Research and Innovation

UCL—Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund

National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC) Moorfields—UCL Therapeutic Acceleration Support Fund

larger-scale survey was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference58 articles.

1. Williams, D.M., Conti, G., Chaturvedi, N., Hughes, A., Ploubidis, G.B., and Silverwood, R.J. (2020). Prevalence of COVID-19, symptoms and testing: Initial findings from the COVID-19 Survey in Five National Longitudinal Studies, UCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies. Available online: https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Prevalence-of-COVID-19-symptoms-and-testing-in-the-UK-Initial-findings-from-COVID-19-survey.pdf.

2. Community Prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in England from April to November, 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey;Pouwels;Lancet Public Health,2021

3. Walker, A.S., Vihta, K., Gethings, O., Pritchard, E., Jones, J., House, T., Bell, I., Bell, J.I., Newton, J.N., and Farrar, J. (2021). Increased infections, but not viral burden, with a new SARS-CoV-2 variant. medRxiv, Preprint.

4. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on antibody responses in the general population in the United Kingdom;Wei;Nat. Microbiol.,2021

5. Impact of vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 cases in the community: A population-based study using the UK’s COVID-19 Infection Survey;Pritchard;Nat. Med.,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3