Affiliation:
1. Logistics Research Center, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
2. Tongji Architectural Design (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
3. Shanghai Research Center for Smart Mobility and Road Safety, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract
Nowadays, conditional automated driving vehicles still need drivers to take-over in the scenarios such as emergency hazard events or driving environments beyond the system’s control. This study aimed to explore the changing trend of the drivers’ takeover behavior under the influence of traffic density and take-over budget time for the entire take-over process in emergency obstacle avoidance scenarios. In the driving simulator, a 2 × 2 factorial design was adopted, including two traffic densities (high density and low density) and two kinds of take-over budget time (3 s and 5 s). A total of 40 drivers were recruited, and each driver was required to complete four simulation experiments. The driver’s take-over process was divided into three phases, including the reaction phase, control phase, and recovery phase. Time parameters, dynamics parameters, and operation parameters were collected for each take-over phase in different obstacle avoidance scenarios. This study analyzed the variability of traffic density and take-over budget time with take-over time, lateral behavior, and longitudinal behavior. The results showed that in the reaction phase, the driver’s reaction time became shorter as the scenario urgency increased. In the control phase, the steering wheel reversal rate, lateral deviation rate, braking rate, average speed, and takeover time were significantly different at different urgency levels. In the recovery phase, the average speed, accelerating rate, and take-over time differed significantly at different urgency levels. For the entire take-over process, the entire take-over time increased with the increase in urgency. The lateral take-over behavior tended to be aggressive first and then became defensive, and the longitudinal take-over behavior was defensive with the increase in urgency. The findings will provide theoretical and methodological support for the improvement of take-over behavior assistance in emergency take-over scenarios. It will also be helpful to optimize the human-machine interaction system.
Funder
National Science Foundation of China
Shanghai Sailing Program
Shanghai Science and Technology Program
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference32 articles.
1. Autonomous vehicle perception: The technology of today and tomorrow;Brummelen;Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol.,2018
2. Google (2022, October 26). Google Self-Driving Car Testing Report on Disengagements of Autonomous Mode. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi_iprOoof9AhWpwjgGHeABDiAQFnoECAoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Flegacy-assets.eenews.net%2Fopen_files%2Fassets%2F2016%2F10%2F17%2Fdocument_gw_08.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3laynAxuAJRyKnoBEUuz92.
3. Human factors of transitions in automated driving; a general framework and literature survey;Lu;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2016
4. Gold, C., and Bengler, K. (2014). Taking over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. Proc., 8.
5. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving;Zeeb;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献