Physical Activity Intensity Measurement and Health: State of the Art and Future Directions for Scientific Research

Author:

Rey-López Juan Pablo12,Lee Dong Hoon34ORCID,Ferrari Gerson56ORCID,Giovannucci Edward478,Rezende Leandro F. M.9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad International de Valencia (VIU), 46002 Valencia, Spain

2. Faculty of Sports, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain

3. Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea

4. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

5. Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago 9170022, Chile

6. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile

7. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

8. Department of Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

9. Department of Preventive Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04023-900, Brazil

Abstract

Physical activity guidelines for health recommend any type of unstructured physical activity for health promotion. Adults should perform at least 150–300 min per week of moderate intensity or 75–150 min per week of vigorous intensity activities, or an equivalent combination of the two intensities. However, the relationship between physical activity intensity and longevity remains a debated topic, with conflicting perspectives offered by epidemiologists, clinical exercise physiologists or anthropologists. This paper addresses the current known role of physical activity intensity (in particular vigorous versus moderate intensity) on mortality and the existing problems of measurement. Given the diversity of existing proposals to categorize physical activity intensity, we call for a common methodology. Device-based physical activity measurements (e.g., wrist accelerometers) have been proposed as a valid method to measure physical activity intensity. An appraisal of the results reported in the literature, however, highlights that wrist accelerometers have not yet demonstrated sufficient criterion validity when they are compared to indirect calorimetry. Novel biosensors and wrist accelerometers will help us understand how different metrics of physical activity relates to human health, however, all these technologies are not enough mature to provide personalized applications for healthcare or sports performance.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference38 articles.

1. Lieberman, D.E. (2020). Exercised: Why Something We Never Evolved to Do Is Healthy and Rewarding, Pantheon Books.

2. Pontzer, H. (2021). Burn: The Misunderstood Science of Metabolism, Allen Lane.

3. Physical activity guidelines 2020: Comprehensive and inclusive recommendations to activate populations;Ding;Lancet,2020

4. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2018). 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report, US Department of Health and Human Services.

5. (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, World Health Organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3