Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Assessing Effect of E-Cigarettes on Cigarette Initiation among Adolescent Never-Smokers

Author:

Dautzenberg Bertrand12ORCID,Legleye Stéphane34,Underner Michel5ORCID,Arvers Philippe6ORCID,Pothegadoo Bhavish7,Bensaidi Abdelhalim8

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Université & ex CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière (APHP), 14 Avenue Bosquet, 75007 Paris, France

2. Institut Arthur Vernes, Tabacologie, 75006 Paris, France

3. Ensai & Cesp, 35172 Bruz, France

4. Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine UVSQ, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

5. Centre Hospitalier Laborit, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pierre Deniker, Tabacologie, 86000 Poitiers, France

6. 7ème Centre Médical des Armées, Quartier De Reyniès, D1075, Consultation Addictologie et Tabacologie, 38760 Varces-Allières-et-Risset, France

7. Hôpital Maison Lafitte, Unité de Cardiologie, 78600 Maison Lafitte, France

8. Hôpital de Nanterre, Diabétologie, 92000 Nanterre, France

Abstract

Prospective longitudinal studies mainly conclude on a causal role of e-cigarettes in the initiation of cigarettes in flagrant contradiction with conclusions drawn from epidemiology and other studies showing a sharp decline in cigarette use in parallel with the spread of e-cigarette use. This systematic review explores the reasons for this discrepancy. Methods. Among 84 publications on e-cigarette/cigarette association in adolescents identified in the Medline database from 2011 to 2022, 23 concern 22 never-smoker longitudinal sub-cohorts. Results. A link between e-cigarette experimentation at T1 and cigarette initiation at T2 is reported in sub-cohort analyses of never-smokers (AOR: 1.41 to 8.30). However, studies exclude 64.3% of T1 e-cigarette experimenters (because of dual-use) and 74.1% of T2 cigarette experimenters. With this study design, e-cigarettes contribute only to 5.3% of T2 cigarette experimentation, casting major doubt on the external validity of results and authors’ conclusions that e-cigarettes have a significant effect on the initiation of cigarettes (Gateway effect) at the population level. This sub-cohort design prohibits highlighting any Diversion effect, which is the most likely mechanism accounting for the competition between these two products. Conclusions. While nicotine abstinence remains the best medical option, over-regulation of e-cigarettes because of misinterpretation of longitudinal study results may be detrimental to public health and tobacco control.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3