Legal Awareness and Practices of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) among United Arab Emirates Medical Practitioners
-
Published:2023-03-07
Issue:6
Volume:20
Page:4710
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Al Awar Shamsa1ORCID, Zareba Kornelia1ORCID, Sallam Gehan Sayed1, Osman Nawal1, Ucenic Teodora1ORCID, Khair Howaida1, Shdefat Suzan Al2ORCID, Fattah Hadya Abdel3, Maki Sara1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain 17666, United Arab Emirates 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordanian University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha 3030, Jordan 3. Nursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Ain P.O. Box. 24162, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), due to its regional occurrence, is a marginalized issue in the international arena. The aim of the study was to verify reasons for performing a procedure prohibited by international and domestic law. A cross-sectional study was conducted among nurses and doctors practicing in the UAE. The study was conducted from the 1 of January 2020 to the 31 of December 2021. The total number of recruited individuals who agreed to participate was 120, with the rate of return being 82%. About half of the participants (n = 59, 49.2%) have seen FGM/C patients in their UAE practice. Regarding medical staff, the total knowledge score concerning possible complications of the performed procedure was assessed at 64%, i.e., at a moderate level. None of our study participants had previously performed any type of FGM/C. However, 6.7% were willing to do it upon a mother’s or guardian’s request. About 83% of study participants stated that FGM/C should be halted internationally. Only 26.7% of the medical practitioners were aware of UAE law concerning FGM/C, while 50% had no knowledge concerning this issue. The present study reveals that cultural conditions take priority over medical knowledge, making medical practitioners inclined to accept the circumcision of girls and women. The crucial goals of future activities should focus on sensitizing society and the medical community, the need to create clear laws penalizing the practice, and the legal obligation to report the circumcision of a girl or woman.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference35 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2008). Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An Interagency Statement OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43839/9789241596442_eng.pdf;jsessionid=FF504A5EF023C01F6F0011112DD1F772?sequence=1. 2. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Maternal and Perinatal Health Outcomes in European and African Countries;Sylla;BMJ Glob. Health,2020 3. An Overview of Female Genital Mutilation;Dilbaz;J. Turk. Soc. Obstet. Gynecol.,2019 4. UNICEF (2022, November 21). Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation/#:~:text=While%20the%20exact%20number%20of,with%20representative%20data%20on%20prevalence. 5. Al Awar, S., Al-Jefout, M., Osman, N., Balayah, Z., Al Kindi, N., and Ucenic, T. (2020). Prevalence, Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting (FGM/C) among United Arab Emirates Population. BMC Womens Health, 20.
|
|