Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation

Author:

Thijssen Marjolein123ORCID,Graff Maud J. L.12,Lexis Monique A. S.4,Nijhuis-van der Sanden Maria W. G.1ORCID,Radford Kate5ORCID,Logan Pip A.56ORCID,Daniels Ramon4,Kuijer-Siebelink Wietske78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Research Institute, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

2. Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3. Department Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands

4. Research Centre Assistive Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, 6419 DJ Heerlen, The Netherlands

5. Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK

6. Nottingham City Care Partnership, Nottingham NG6 8WR, UK

7. School of Education, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands

8. Radboudumc Health Academy, Research on Learning and Education, Radboud University MEDICAL Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Dementia-friendly communities (DFCs) are seen as key to the inclusion and participation of people with dementia and carers. Dementia-friendly initiatives (DFIs) are important building blocks for the growth of DFCs. The collaboration between different stakeholders is a central aspect in developing and sustaining DFIs. Aim: This study tests and refines an initial theory about collaborating for DFIs with special attention for the involvement of people with dementia and their carers during the collaboration for DFIs. The realist approach is used for deepening contextual aspects, mechanisms, outcomes, and its explanatory power. Methods: A participatory case study design using qualitative data (focus groups, observations, reflections, minutes from meetings, and exit interviews) was executed in four Dutch municipalities that have ambitions to become dementia- friendly communities. Results: The refined theory on the collaboration for DFIs incorporates contextual aspects such as diversity, shared insights, and clarity. It draws attention to the importance of mechanisms such as the recognition of efforts and progress, informal distributed leadership, interdependency, belonging, significance, and commitment. These mechanisms resonate with feeling useful and feeling collectively powerful in the collaboration. The outcomes of collaboration were activation, getting new ideas, and fun. Our findings address how stakeholders’ routines and perspectives impact the involvement of people with dementia and their carers during collaboration. Conclusion: This study provides detailed information about collaboration for DFIs. The collaboration for DFIs is largely influenced by feeling useful and collectively powerful. Further research is needed to understand how these mechanisms can be triggered with the involvement of people with dementia and their carers in the heart of the collaboration.

Funder

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference77 articles.

1. Advancing Health Equity And Reducing Health Disparities For People With Disabilities In The United States: Study examines health equity and health disparities for people with disabilities in the United States;Mitra;Health Aff.,2022

2. What are Health Disparities and Health Equity? We Need to Be Clear;Braveman;Public Health Rep.,2014

3. Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population;Krahn;Am. J. Public Health,2015

4. Guerchet, M., Prince, M., and Prina, M. (2020). Numbers of People with Dementia Worldwide: An Update to the Estimates in the World Alzheimer Report 2015, Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI).

5. Social participation perspectives of people with cognitive problems and their care-givers: A descriptive qualitative study;Donkers;Ageing Soc.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3