Abstract
Environmental pollution liability insurance is becoming increasingly important for China to achieve its emission reduction targets. Insurance pricing is a crucial factor restricting the market share of environment pollution liability insurance, from the perspective of the Black–Scholes pricing model, which in turn has influenced the solvency of insurance companies in China. Firstly, this study analyzes the problems existing in compulsory liability insurance for environmental pollution in China. It proceeds with analyzing the price of compulsory environmental pollution liability insurance using the Black–Scholes pricing model, and derives a high premium insurance rate of 2.44%. Moreover, it performs a multivariate regression analysis using the asset and liability data, taken from the annual report, to identify three key factors affecting the solvency adequacy ratio, namely, capital debt ratio, reflecting the company asset structure; net interest rate on assets, reflecting the asset scale with actual solvency; and claim ratio, reflecting the business quality. Based on the results of regression analysis and robustness test for the China Insurance Clauses (CIC) company, People’s Insurance Company of China (PICC), and Asia-Pacific Property & Casualty Insurance (API) company, it is shown that the effect of total asset, total debt, capital debt ratio, claim ratio, and net interest rate on assets on the solvency adequacy ratio is significant, with respect to the size of the coefficients. Based on the Black–Scholes pricing model found in the previous cycle of liability insurance, and keeping in view the existing problems of environmental pollution liability insurance expenditure, this paper presents suggestions that are conducive to improving the solvency of insurance companies in China.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference57 articles.
1. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade;Shui;Energy Policy,2006
2. Climate change and unresolved issue in WTO law;Condon;J. Int. Econ. Law,2009
3. Optimal tariff calculations in tariff games with climate change considerations;Dong;Appl. Econ. Lett.,2011
4. Border tax adjustments and the EU-ETS: A quantitative assessment. Holland: Central Planning Bureau;Mander;CPB Doc.,2008
5. Recycled effluent: Should the polluter pay;Feinerman;Am. J. Agric. Econ.,2001