Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Production on COVID-19 and Vaccines
-
Published:2023-03-08
Issue:6
Volume:20
Page:4796
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Sousa Neto Antonio Rosa de1ORCID, Carvalho Ana Raquel Batista de1, Ferreira da Silva Márcia Daiane1, Rêgo Neta Marly Marques1, Sena Inara Viviane de Oliveira1, Almeida Rosângela Nunes1, Filha Francidalma Soares Sousa Carvalho1, Lima e Silva Laianny Luize1, Costa Girlene Ribeiro da1, Lira Ivana Mayra da Silva1, Portela Denise Maria Meneses Cury2, Oliveira e Silva Amanda Tauana3, Rabêlo Cristiane Borges de Moura1, Valle Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa1, Moura Maria Eliete Batista1, Freitas Daniela Reis Joaquim de4
Affiliation:
1. Nursing Department, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil 2. Department of Medicine, Centro Universitário Uninovafapi, Teresina 64073-505, Brazil 3. Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina 64001-020, Brazil 4. Department of Parasitology and Microbiology, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil
Abstract
This bibliometric analysis aims to analyze the global scientific production of COVID-19 and vaccines. First, a search for scientific articles was performed using the advanced query in the Web of Science™ database, more precisely in its core collection, on 18 February 2023. Data from 7754 articles were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package and the Biblioshiny application. The evaluated articles were published mainly in 2022 (60%). The scientific journals that published the most about COVID-19 and vaccines were “Vaccines”, “Vaccine” and “Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics”. The University of Oxford was the most productive institution, with the authors of the articles mainly originating from the United States, China and the United Kingdom. The United States, despite having carried out the most significant number of collaborations, published mainly with local researchers. The 15 most cited articles and the KeyWords Plus™ evidenced the focus of the published articles on the safety and efficacy of vaccines against COVID-19, as well as on the evaluation of vaccine acceptance, more specifically on vaccine hesitancy. Research funding came primarily from US government agencies.
Funder
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference77 articles.
1. A 50-Year Overview of the Coronavirus Family with Science Mapping Techniques: A Review;Tabur;Iran. J. Public Health,2021 2. Xu, J., Zhao, S., Teng, T., Abdalla, A.E., Zhu, W., Xie, L., Wang, Y., and Guo, X. (2020). Systematic Comparison of Two Animal-to-Human Transmitted Human Coronaviruses: SARS–CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Viruses, 12. 3. Khan, M., Adil, S.F., Alkhathlan, H.Z., Tahir, M.N., Saif, S., Khan, M., and Khan, S.T. (2020). COVID-19: A Global Challenge with Old History, Epidemiology and Progress So Far. Molecules, 26. 4. World Health Organization (2023, January 01). Advice for the Public: Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. 5. Meyer, H., Ehmann, R., and Smith, G.L. (2020). Smallpox in the post-eradication era. Viruses, 12.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|