COVID-19 Vaccination: Comparison of Attitudes, Decision-Making Processes, and Communication among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Black Americans

Author:

Cunningham-Erves Jennifer1,George Whitney2ORCID,Stewart Elizabeth C.1ORCID,Footman Alison3,Davis Jamaine4,Sanderson Maureen5,Smalls Meredith6,Morris Phillip1,Clarkson Kristin7,Lee Omaran8,Brandt Heather M.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, School of Medicine, 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd, Nashville, TN 37208, USA

2. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN 27232, USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA

4. Department of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd, Nashville, TN 37208, USA

5. Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd, Nashville, TN 37208, USA

6. Meharry Vanderbilt Alliance, 1903 Meharry Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37208, USA

7. Congregational Health & Education Network, 1818 Albion St, Nashville, TN 37208, USA

8. Centers for Wellbeing, P.O. Box 330191, Nashville, TN 37203, USA

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccination rates remain suboptimal among Black Americans who disproportionately experience higher hospitalization and death rates than White Americans. Methods: We conducted a multi-method (interviews and surveys) study among 30 Black Americans (n = 16 vaccinated, n = 14 unvaccinated) to explore factors related to vaccination hesitancy, decision-making processes, and communication related to uptake. Participants were recruited by using community-driven approaches, including partner collaborations. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, and descriptive and bivariate analysis was used for quantitative data. Results: Of those unvaccinated, 79% (n = 11) stated they were delaying and 21% (n = 3) were declining vaccination indefinitely. When asked about the likelihood of vaccine initiation in 6 months and 12 months, 29% (n = 4) and 36% (n = 5), respectively, stated that they would receive the vaccine. The following themes emerged: (1) COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy exists on a continuum; (2) varied decision-making processes for COVID-19 vaccination; (3) motivators among vaccinated individuals; (4) barriers among unvaccinated individuals; (5) retrieving and navigating vaccine information within the COVID-19 infodemic; and (6) parent perspectives on child vaccination. Conclusions: Findings suggest that vaccinated and unvaccinated participants had similar and dissimilar perspectives in decision-making processes and vaccine concerns as shown in the Decision-making Processes for the COVID-19 vaccination (DePC) model. Based on these findings, future studies should further explore how factors influencing decision-making can lead to divergent outcomes for COVID-19 vaccination.

Funder

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

American Lebanese and Syrian Associated Charities

Association of American Medical Colleges

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference43 articles.

1. CDC (2022, November 08). COVID Data Tracker, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker.

2. CDC (2022, December 04). Cases, Data, and Surveillance, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-race-ethnicity.html.

3. Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity;Tenforde;JAMA,2021

4. Real-World Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis;Zheng;Int. J. Infect Dis.,2022

5. CDC (2022, December 04). COVID Data Tracker, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographicsovertime.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3