Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Poland Compared with other European Countries from the Patient’s Perspective: Insights from the EHRA Patient Survey

Author:

Januszkiewicz Łukasz1ORCID,Grabowski Marcin1,Farkowski Michał Mirosław2ORCID,Życiński Paweł3,Jędrychowski Tomasz4,Pytkowski Mariusz2,Chun Julian K. R.5,Guerra Jose M.6,Conte Giulio78,Barra Sérgio9,Boveda Serge101112ORCID,Kempa Maciej13

Affiliation:

1. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland

2. II Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Insitute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland

3. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, 91-347 Lodz, Poland

4. Department of Cardiology, Voivodship Specialist Hospital, 06-400 Ciechanow, Poland

5. CCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markuskrankenhaus, 60431 Frankfurt, Germany

6. Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, IIB SANT PAU, CIBERCV, 08025 Barcelona, Spain

7. Cardiology Department, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland

8. Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland

9. Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida, 4400-346 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

10. Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France

11. Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

12. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, 75015 Paris, France

13. Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare differences between Polish ICD recipients and ICD recipients from other European countries in terms of quality of life, information provision before ICD implantation, and end-of-life issues. Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the “Living with an ICD” patient survey (25-item questionnaire) organized by the European Heart Rhythm Association between 12 April 2021 and 5 July 2021 in ten European countries. Results: There were 410 (22.7%) patients from Poland and 1399 (77.3%) from other European countries. A total of 51.0% of Polish patients reported improvement in their quality of life compared with 44.3% in other countries (p = 0.041). Remote monitoring was three times more often utilized in other countries than in Poland (66.8% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). While 78.1% of Poles felt well informed before ICD implantation compared with 69.6% of subjects from other countries (p = 0.001), they were less familiar with the ICD deactivation process than others (38.9% vs. 52.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite the less frequent use of remote monitoring and gaps in end-of-life issues, Polish ICD recipients reported more favorable quality of life and a higher level of information received before device placement than patients in other European countries.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3