Multiple Concurrent Causal Relationships and Multiple Governance Pathways for Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Policies in Pandemics: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 102 Countries and Regions
-
Published:2023-01-04
Issue:2
Volume:20
Page:931
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Zhang Yaming, Zhang JiaqiORCID, Koura Yaya Hamadou, Feng Changyuan, Su Yanyuan, Song Wenjie, Kong Linghao
Abstract
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has been wreaking havoc on all aspects of human societies. In addition to pharmaceutical interventions, non-pharmaceutical intervention policies have been proven to be crucial in slowing down the spread of the virus and reducing the impact of the outbreak on economic development, daily life, and social stability. However, no studies have focused on which non-pharmaceutical intervention policies are more effective; this is the focus of our study. We used data samples from 102 countries and regions around the world and selected seven categories of related policies, including work and school suspensions, assembly restrictions, movement restrictions, home isolation, international population movement restrictions, income subsidies, and testing and screening as the condition variables. A susceptible-exposed-infected-quarantined-recovered (SEIQR) model considering non-pharmaceutical intervention policies and latency with infectiousness was constructed to calculate the epidemic transmission rate as the outcome variable, and a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method was applied to explore the multiple concurrent causal relationships and multiple governance paths of non-pharmaceutical intervention policies for epidemics from the configuration perspective. We found a total of four non-pharmaceutical intervention policy pathways. Among them, L1 was highly suppressive, L2 was moderately suppressive, and L3 was externally suppressive. The results also showed that individual non-pharmaceutical intervention policy could not effectively suppress the spread of the pandemic. Moreover, three specific non-pharmaceutical intervention policies, including work stoppage and school closure, testing and screening, and economic subsidies, had a universal effect in the policies grouping for effective control of the pandemic transmission.
Funder
National Social Science Foundation of China National Natural Science Foundation of China Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Science and Technology Research Project of Hebei Provincial Department of Education
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference42 articles.
1. Analysis of the role of current prevention and control measures in the epidemic of Corona Virus Disease 2019 based on SEIR model;Geng;J. Jinan Univ. (Nat. Sci. Med. Ed.),2020 2. Cvetković, V.M., Nikolić, N., Radovanović Nenadić, U., Öcal, A., Noji, E.K., and Zečević, M. (2020). Preparedness and preventive behaviors for a pandemic disaster caused by COVID-19 in Serbia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17. 3. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China (2020). China’s Actions Against COVID-19. Renmin Ribao., 10, 1–30. (In Chinese). 4. Leontitsis, A., Senok, A., Alsheikh-Ali, A., Al Nasser, Y., Loney, T., and Alshamsi, A. (2021). SEAHIR: A specialized compartmental model for COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18. 5. Hatami, F., Chen, S., Paul, R., and Thill, J.C. (2022). Simulating and forecasting the COVID-19 spread in a U.S. Metropolitan region with a spatial SEIR model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.
|
|