Drug Recommendation from Diagnosis Codes: Classification vs. Collaborative Filtering Approaches

Author:

Sae-Ang Apichat,Chairat SawrawitORCID,Tansuebchueasai NatchadaORCID,Fumaneeshoat OrapanORCID,Ingviya ThammasinORCID,Chaichulee SitthichokORCID

Abstract

Over time, large amounts of clinical data have accumulated in electronic health records (EHRs), making it difficult for healthcare professionals to navigate and make patient-centered decisions. This underscores the need for healthcare recommendation systems that help medical professionals make faster and more accurate decisions. This study addresses drug recommendation systems that generate an appropriate list of drugs that match patients’ diagnoses. Currently, recommendations are manually prepared by physicians, but this is difficult for patients with multiple comorbidities. We explored approaches to drug recommendations based on elderly patients with diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease who visited primary-care clinics and often had multiple conditions. We examined both collaborative filtering approaches and traditional machine-learning classifiers. The hybrid model between the two yielded a recall at 5 of 76.61%, a precision at 5 of 46.20%, a macro-averaged area under the curve of 74.52%, and an average physician agreement of 47.50%. Although collaborative filtering is widely used in recommendation systems, our results showed that it consistently underperformed traditional classification. Collaborative filtering was sensitive to class imbalances and favored the more popular classes. This study highlighted challenges that need to be addressed when developing recommendation systems in EHRs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference25 articles.

1. Noncommunicable Diseases;Hunter;N. Engl. J. Med.,2013

2. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators (2016). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet, 388, 1659–1724.

3. Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease;Sowers;Hypertension,2001

4. Non-communicable diseases in the Asia-Pacific region: Prevalence, risk factors and community-based prevention;Low;Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health,2014

5. Hao, F., and Blair, R.H. (2016). A comparative study: Classification vs. user-based collaborative filtering for clinical prediction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 16.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An interpretable approach using hybrid graph networks and explainable AI for intelligent diagnosis recommendations in chronic disease care;Biomedical Signal Processing and Control;2024-05

2. Medical Artificial Intelligence Research Landscape in Thailand: A Bibliometric Analysis;2023 18th International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (iSAI-NLP);2023-11-27

3. Interpretable Medical Recommendations Based on SHAPs;2023 IEEE 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (PRAI);2023-08-18

4. Interpretable Machine Learning for Personalized Medical Recommendations: A LIME-Based Approach;Diagnostics;2023-08-15

5. Drug Recommender System Based on Collaborative Filtering for Multiple Sclerosis Patients;2023 9th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR);2023-05-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3