Methods and Strategies for Biomonitoring in Occupational Exposure to Plant Protection Products Containing Glyphosate

Author:

Moldovan Horațiu1,Imre Silvia23,Duca Radu Corneliu4ORCID,Farczádi Lénárd2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureş, Romania

2. Center for Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureş, Romania

3. Faculty of Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureş, Romania

4. Environmental Hygiene and Biological Monitoring Unit, Department of Health Protection, National Health Laboratory (LNS), 3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg

Abstract

Glyphosate, and the ever growing reliance on its use in agriculture, has been a point of contention for many years. There have been debates regarding the risk and safety of using glyphosate-based herbicides as well as the effects of occupational, accidental, or systematic. Although there have been a number of studies conducted, the biomonitoring of glyphosate poses a series of challenges. Researchers attempting to determine the occupational exposure face questions regarding the most appropriate analytical techniques and sampling procedures. The present review aims to summarize and synthetize the analytical methodologies available and suitable for the purpose of glyphosate biomonitoring studies as well as discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each analytical technique, from the most modern to more well-established and older ones. The most relevant publications that have described analytical methods and published within the last 12 years were studied. Methods were compared, and the advantages and disadvantages of each methods were discussed. A total of 35 manuscripts describing analytical methods for glyphosate determination were summarized and discussed, with the most relevant one being compared. For methods that were not intended for biological samples, we discussed if they could be used for biomonitoring and approaches to adapt these methods for this purpose.

Funder

George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Romania

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference60 articles.

1. Nandula, V.K. (2010). Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management, Wiley Online Library.

2. Fon, T.A.D., and Uhing, E.H. (1964). Aminomethylenephosphonic Acids, Salts Thereof, and Process for Their Production. (3,160,632), U.S. Patent.

3. Schuette, J. (1998). Environmental Fate of Glyphosate, Environmental Monitoring & Pest Management Department of Pesticide Regulation Sacramento.

4. Molecular basis of glyphosate resistance—Different approaches through protein engineering;Pollegioni;FEBS J.,2011

5. Micronucleus Formation Induced by Glyphosate and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides in Human Peripheral White Blood Cells;Nagy;Front. Public Health,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3