An Integrative Literature Review of Interventions to Protect People with Disabilities from Domestic and Family Violence

Author:

Saleme Pamela1ORCID,Seydel Tori1ORCID,Pang Bo1,Deshpande Sameer1ORCID,Parkinson Joy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social Marketing @ Griffith, Department of Marketing, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia

2. Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO, Level 7 296 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia

Abstract

Purpose: While domestic and family violence against people with disabilities is an ongoing and crucial public health concern, and awareness of the extent of violence against people with disabilities is growing, research on the field is still limited. Thus, the present review aims to systematically identify and synthesize evidence and effectiveness from intervention strategies to increase the awareness and skills of those with disabilities to reduce and prevent domestic and family violence against them. Method: PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform a systematic search of seven scientific databases to identify the peer-reviewed literature. Results: A total of 17 eligible studies were identified (14 evaluations and 3 descriptive studies), with most taking place in developed countries. Children and women are the most frequent victims, and they were therefore the most common target audience of the included studies. Sexual, physical, and verbal abuse were the most reported types of abuse, while financial abuse and neglect were studied less often. Interventions also focused on a diversity of disabilities, including learning, intellectual, mental, and physical impairments. Overall, the intervention strategies reflected a substantial homogeneity: focus on training and education as well as setting up channels and facilities for victims to seek help. Nine studies yielded significant positive outcomes using various strategies and techniques, while five studies had mixed results, and three studies only reported on the intervention strategies but did not evaluate the results. Conclusions: This review confirms a significant gap in the literature on domestic and family violence against people with disabilities and how to prevent and address the violence through evidence-based interventions. Several recommendations to improve future research and practice are proposed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference46 articles.

1. “Not an either/or situation”: The minimization of violence against women in United Kingdom “domestic abuse” policy;Aldridge;Violence Against Women,2021

2. Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis: Domestic Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic;Piquero;J. Crim. Justice,2021

3. Interpersonal violence against people with disabilities: Additional concerns and considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic;Lund;Rehabil. Psychol.,2020

4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2022, June 30). Disability and Violence-In Focus: Crime and Justice Statistics, Available online: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/focus-crime-and-justice-statistics/latest-release.

5. Australian Public Service Commission (2022, July 05). Definition of Disability, Available online: https://www.apsc.gov.au/definition-disability.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3