“It’s That They Treated Me Like an Object”: A Qualitative Study on the Participation of People Diagnosed with Psychotic Disorders in Their Health Care

Author:

Villena-Jimena Amelia123ORCID,Morales-Asencio José Miguel23ORCID,Quemada Casta123ORCID,Hurtado María M.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mental Health Unit, Regional University Hospital, 29009 Málaga, Spain

2. Faculty of Heath Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain

3. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, 29590 Málaga, Spain

Abstract

The mental health recovery model is based on shared decision making, in which patients’ preferences and perceptions of the care received are taken into account. However, persons with psychosis usually have very few opportunities to participate in this process. The present study explores the experiences and perceptions of a group of patients with psychosis—in some cases longstanding, in others more recently diagnosed—concerning their participation in the decisions taken about the approach to their condition and about the attention received from healthcare professionals and services. For this purpose, we performed a qualitative analysis of the outcomes derived from five focus groups and six in-depth interviews (36 participants). Two major themes, with five sub-themes, were identified: shared decision-making (drug-centred approach, negotiation process, and lack of information) and the care environment and styles of clinical practice as determinants (aggressive versus person-centred environments, and styles of professional practice). The main conclusions drawn are that users want to participate more in decision making, they want to be offered a range of psychosocial options from the outset and that their treatment should be based on accessibility, humanity and respect. These findings are in line with the guidelines for clinical practice and should be taken into account in the design of care programmes and the organisation of services for persons with psychosis.

Funder

The University of Málaga & IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference61 articles.

1. Recovery from versus Recovery in Serious Mental Illness: One Strategy for Lessening Confusion Plaguing Recovery;Davidson;J. Ment. Health,2007

2. Shepherd, G., Boardman, J., and Slade, M. (2008). Making Recovery a Reality|Centre for Mental Health, Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.

3. Shared Decision Making Interventions for People with Mental Health Conditions;Duncan;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2010

4. Implementing Shared Decision Making in Routine Mental Health Care: Forum—Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care;Slade;World Psychiatry,2017

5. World Health Organization (2013). Exploring Patient Participation in Reducing Health-Care-Related Safety Risks, World Health Organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3