Opinions of Older Individuals on Advance Care Planning and Factors Affecting Their Views: A Systematic Review

Author:

Korkmaz Yaylagul Nilufer1ORCID,Demirdas Fatma Banu2ORCID,Melo Pedro34ORCID,Silva Rosa567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Akdeniz, Antalya 07070, Turkey

2. Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Turgut Ozal, Malatya 44210, Turkey

3. Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

4. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

5. Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

6. Porto Nursing School (ESEP), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

7. Portugal Center for Evidence Based Practice, A JBI Center of Excellence (PCEBP), 3030 Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review is to present older individuals’ views on the advance care planning (ACP) process and the factors affecting those opinions. The review contains search terms predetermined in the databases of CINAHL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Academic Search Ultimate, Web of Science, Master FILE, and TR Dizin over the last 10 years (1 January 2012–31 December 2021) in English and Turkish. The studies were included in the research using inclusion (sample age ≥ 50, focusing on individuals’ opinions on ACP) and exclusion (articles whose samples consisted of individuals with a specific disease, non-research articles) criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was used to collate findings. The most striking results are the positive perspectives increasing in parallel with the individuals’ level of knowledge and experience about ACP. Variables affecting their views are advanced age, marital status, socioeconomic status, perception of remaining life expectancy, self-perceived health, number and stage of chronic diseases, religion, and cultural characteristics. This study offers guidance on the application and dissemination of ACP, empowering the use of this practice given the perspectives of older adults on ACP and the factors that affect them that the data show.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference40 articles.

1. Wahl, H.-W., and Tesch-Römer, C. (2000). Angewandte Gerontologie in Schlüsselbegriffen, Kohlhammer.

2. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: An international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care;Rietjens;Lancet Oncol.,2017

3. Institute of Medicine (2015). Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life, The National Academies Press.

4. Garnering support for advance care planning;Fried;JAMA,2010

5. Looking back at withdrawal of life-support law and policy to see what lies ahead for medical aid-in-dying;Capron;Yale J. Biol. Med.,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3