Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Kim Min Kyoung12ORCID,Choi Geun Joo13,Oh Kyung Seo1ORCID,Lee Sang Phil4,Kang Hyun13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong-si 14353, Republic of Korea

3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea

4. Department of Biomedical Engineering Graduate School, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Republic of Korea

Abstract

The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, public clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials and Clinical Research Information Service), and OpenSIGLE to identify relevant studies published prior to May 2023 and included studies that evaluated the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI for intra- or post-operative pain assessment during general anesthesia. Among the 962 studies identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting intra-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve of ANI were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.83; I2 = 68.2%), 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92–0.93; I2 = 99.8%), 2.32 (95% CI = 1.33–3.30; I2 = 61.7%), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.76–0.78; I2 = 87.4%), respectively. ANI values and changes in intra-operative hemodynamic variables showed statistically significant correlations. For predicting post-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ANI were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87–0.93; I2 = 58.7%), 0.51 (95% CI = 0.49–0.52; I2 = 99.9%), and 3.38 (95% CI = 2.87–3.88; I2 = 81.2%), respectively. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia is a valuable measurement for predicting intra- and post-operative pain. It reduces the use of intra-operative opioids and aids in pain management throughout the perioperative period.

Funder

National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference65 articles.

1. 33rd Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine;Hochhausen;Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.,2015

2. Pain/analgesia evaluation using heart rate variability analysis;Logier;Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.,2006

3. Pain-autonomic interactions;Benarroch;Neurol. Sci.,2006

4. Measurement of the nociceptive balance by analgesia nociception index and surgical pleth index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia;Gruenewald;Minerva Anestesiol.,2015

5. Intraoperative “analgesia nociception index”-guided fentanyl administration during sevoflurane anesthesia in lumbar discectomy and laminectomy: A randomized clinical trial;Upton;Anesth. Analg.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3