Affiliation:
1. Department of Health, Life and Environmental Science, University of L‘Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2. Academy of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy (AOMT), Pacific Palisades, CA 90272, USA
Abstract
Background: Intraoral orthodontic elastics (IOE), typically referred to as rubber bands, are important tools for correcting malocclusion, and they are classified into latex and synthetic (elastomeric-based) elastics. They have different strengths and sizes, depending on their intended use, that provide clinicians with the ability to correct both anteroposterior and vertical discrepancies. Clinical use, together with saliva, alters the physical characteristics of both latex and synthetic elastics, causing declines in strength over time. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess, through a systematic review of in vitro studies, the properties of intraoral elastics. The primary goal was to evaluate how IOEs behave in terms of tension strength and duration. The secondary goal was to investigate the force loss during the first hours of wear. The tertiary goal was to assess how these forces decayed. Materials and methods: The following electronic databases were searched from December 2020 to April 2021: Medline Full Text, PubMed, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Science Direct, and Literature Review. Out of 8505 initial articles, 10 were selected for the systematic review. Results: The force-degradation property was found in all types of IOEs. The loss of strength was directly proportional to time, with the highest value during the first 3 h after extension, regardless of the elastic band size and manufacturer. The forces generated by the latex bands were higher than in those of the elastomeric-based elastics, but they did not consistently correspond to the loads specified by the manufacturers. The retention forces in the latex IOEs were significantly higher than those in the nonlatex bands, suggesting that elastomeric-based bands need to be changed more frequently and at regular intervals throughout a 24 h period. Conclusion: This systematic review indicates that intraoral orthodontic elastics have the greatest loss of force during the first 3 h, that latex rubber bands have the highest strength during the first hour, that the forces generated are not always consistent with the manufacturer’s specifications, and that nonlatex (elastomeric-based) IOEs need to be changed frequently and regularly during a 24-h cycle.
Reference25 articles.
1. Case report of patients treated with an orthodontic and myofunctional protocol;Saccomanno;Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent.,2014
2. Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure;Tweed;Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg.,1944
3. (2022). Dentistry—Elastomeric Auxiliaries for Use in Orthodontics (Standard No. ISO 21606:2022). Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/f88704f1-e528-416f-82ea-473db473581c/iso-21606-2022.
4. A comparison of orthodontic elastic forces: Focus on reduced inventory;Mansour;J. Orthod. Sci.,2017
5. A study of force extension and force degradation of orthodontic latex elastics: An in vitro study;Gangurde;APOS Trends Orthod.,2013