Limitations in Testing the Lense–Thirring Effect with LAGEOS and the Newly Launched Geodetic Satellite LARES 2

Author:

Iorio Lorenzo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito, Viale Unità di Italia 68, I-70125 Bari, Italy

Abstract

The new geodetic satellite LARES 2, cousin of LAGEOS and sharing with it almost the same orbital parameters apart from the inclination, displaced by 180 deg, was launched last year. Its proponents suggest using the sum of the nodes of LAGEOS and of LARES 2 to measure the sum of the Lense–Thirring node precessions independently of the systematic bias caused by the even zonal harmonics of the geopotential, claiming a final ≃0.2 percent total accuracy. In fact, the actual orbital configurations of the two satellites do not allow one to attain the sought for mutual cancellation of their classical node precessions due to the Earth’s quadrupole mass moment, as their sum is still ≃5000 times larger than the added general relativistic rates. This has important consequences. One is that the current uncertainties in the eccentricities and the inclinations of both satellites do not presently allow the stated accuracy goal to be met, needing improvements of 3–4 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, the imperfect knowledge of the Earth’s angular momentum S impacts the uncancelled sum of the node precessions, from 150 to 4900 percent of the relativistic signal depending on the uncertainty assumed in S. It is finally remarked that the real breakthrough in reliably testing the gravitomagnetic field of the Earth would consist in modeling it and simultaneously estimating one or more dedicated parameter(s) along with other ones characterising the geopotential, as is customarily performed for any other dynamical feature.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference94 articles.

1. General relativity: Relative standard mass, momentum, energy and gravitational field in a general system of reference;Cattaneo;Il Nuovo Cimento,1958

2. Thorne, K.S., MacDonald, D.A., and Price, R.H. (1986). Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm, Yale University Press.

3. Shapiro, S.L., Teukolsky, S.A., and Salpeter, E.E. (1986). Highlights of Modern Astrophysics: Concepts and Controversies, Wiley.

4. Fairbank, J.D., Deaver, B.S.J., Everitt, C.W.F., and Michelson, P.F. (1988). Near Zero: New Frontiers of Physics, Freeman.

5. Analogy between general relativity and electromagnetism for slowly moving particles in weak gravitational fields;Harris;Am. J. Phys.,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3