Utility in Time Description in Priority Best–Worst Discrete Choice Models: An Empirical Evaluation Using Flynn’s Data

Author:

Adikari Sasanka1ORCID,Diawara Norou1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA

Abstract

Discrete choice models (DCMs) are applied in many fields and in the statistical modelling of consumer behavior. This paper focuses on a form of choice experiment, best–worst scaling in discrete choice experiments (DCEs), and the transition probability of a choice of a consumer over time. The analysis was conducted by using simulated data (choice pairs) based on data from Flynn’s (2007) ‘Quality of Life Experiment’. Most of the traditional approaches assume the choice alternatives are mutually exclusive over time, which is a questionable assumption. We introduced a new copula-based model (CO-CUB) for the transition probability, which can handle the dependent structure of best–worst choices while applying a very practical constraint. We used a conditional logit model to calculate the utility at consecutive time points and spread it to future time points under dynamic programming. We suggest that the CO-CUB transition probability algorithm is a novel way to analyze and predict choices in future time points by expressing human choice behavior. The numerical results inform decision making, help formulate strategy and learning algorithms under dynamic utility in time for best–worst DCEs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. Louviere, J.J., and Woodworth, G.G. (1990). Best Worst Scaling: A Model for Largest Difference Judgments, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta. Working Paper.

2. Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press.

3. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application;Lancsar;Soc. Sci. Med.,2013

4. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices;Marley;J. Math. Psychol.,2005

5. Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best–worst choice;Marley;J. Math. Psychol.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3