Integrated Analysis of the 3D Geostress and 1D Geomechanics of an Exploration Well in a New Gas Field-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Integrated Analysis of the 3D Geostress and 1D Geomechanics of an Exploration Well in a New Gas Field

Published:2023-01-10 Issue:2 Volume:16 Page:806
ISSN:1996-1073
Container-title:Energies
language:en
Short-container-title:Energies

Author:

Wang Linsheng,Shen Xinpu^ORCID,Wu Baocheng,Shen Tian^ORCID,Shi Jiangang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to propose the workflow for integrated analysis of the 3D geostress and 1D geomechanics of an exploration in a new gas field. This integrated analysis will allow for problems associated with the inaccuracy of 1D geomechanical analysis to be overcome in a region with obvious anticline/syncline structures. The 1D geomechanical analysis of the well in the exploration of a new gas field mainly included the prediction of pore pressure and calculation of the mud weight window for safe drilling. In general, this integrated workflow included both a method for pore pressure prediction and a method for the calculation of the mud weight window, with the numerical solution of 3D geostress plus the interval velocity of formations. The procedure for the calculation of the 3D geostress of a target block was also introduced. Numerical solution of the 3D geostress of the target gas field, as well as solutions of 1D geomechanical analysis, have demonstrated the efficiency and practical use of the proposed theory in the successful drilling of the LT-1 well in the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China. For this LT-1 well in the target TS block, there was no logging data to refer to when predicting the pore pressure of undrilled formations. Only 3D geostress could be used to calculate the mud weight window. Influences of anticline structures were considered in the calculation of 3D geostress. Since the accuracy of the numerical solution of 3D geostress is higher than the accuracy of the 1D geostress solution for a single well analysis, the results of pore pressure and the mud weight window are more accurate than those obtained with conventional 1D geostress analysis. Details of the finite element modeling of the 3D geostress field of the TS block is presented along with the solution of the 3D geostress field. With the data of the interval velocity of formations and 3D geostress solution of the TS block, pore pressure prediction was carried out for the 7000 m-deep pilot LT-1 well. Finally, calculations were performed for the values of the mud weight window of the LT-1 well.

Funder

CNPC’s Major Special Project “Excellent and fast drilling and completion technology and test in key areas include the Southern Edge of Junggar Basin and Mahu Region”

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/806/pdf

Reference15 articles.

1. Lithofacies paleogeography restoration of Jurassic to lower Cretaceous in southern margin of Junggar Basin, NW China;Gao;Pet. Explor. Dev.,2022

2. Pore pressure distributional characterization of shale gas reservoir in WR block of Sichuan basin;Lin;Prog. Geophys.,2021

3. Chilingar, G.V., Serebryakov, V.A., and Robertson, J.O. (2002). Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures, Development in Petroleum, Elsevier.

4. Shen, G.Y., Clemmons, C., and Shen, X.P. (July, January 28). Integrated 1-D workflow for pore-pressure prediction and mud weight window calculation for subsalt well sections. Proceedings of the 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA. Paper NoARMA 15-097.

5. Xu, J.L., Wang, J., and He, D.B. (2018, January 24). A method for calculating pore pressure coefficient directly using ADCIGS. Proceedings of the CPS/SEG International Geophysical Conference & Exposition, Beijing, China. Electronic Papers.