Comprehensive Thermodynamic Evaluation of the Natural Gas-Fired Allam Cycle at Full Load
Author:
Colleoni Lorenzo1ORCID, Sindoni Alessio1ORCID, Ravelli Silvia1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Bergamo, Viale Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine, Italy
Abstract
In this study, thermodynamic modeling and simulations were used to optimize the design point performance of the Allam cycle. The topic fits perfectly with the strategies for power sector decarbonization toward net zero emission. In fact, it offers an environmentally friendlier alternative to natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plants. The focus is on oxyfuel combustion that, combined with supercritical CO2 (sCO2) stream as working fluid, produces high-purity CO2, electricity, and water by means of a highly recuperated Brayton cycle. The former is ready for sequestration, pipeline injection, or other applications, such as enhanced oil recovery or industrial processes. Being designed within the last decade, large-scale plants are poorly documented in the published literature and not yet ready for operation. Accordingly, a thermodynamic model was developed for a net power (Pn) output of 300 MW. After validation against the little data available from academic studies, simulation sets were conceived to assess the impact of main process parameters on cycle efficiency. To that end, operating conditions of the compressor, turbine, and air separation unit (ASU) were varied in a parametric analysis, preparatory to performance optimization. For the chosen layout, the maximum net electric efficiency (ηel,n) was found to be 50.4%, without thermal recovery from ASU.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference35 articles.
1. IEA (2022). Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021—Global Emissions Rebound Sharply to Highest Ever Level, International Renewable Energy Agency. 2. Zakeri, B., Paulavets, K., Barreto-Gomez, L., Echeverri, L.G., Pachauri, S., Boza-Kiss, B., Zimm, C., Rogelj, J., Creutzig, F., and Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2022). Pandemic, War, and Global Energy Transitions. Energies, 15. 3. (2023, January 11). Global Electricity Review 2022. Available online: https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2022/. 4. Holechek, J.L., Geli, H.M.E., Sawalhah, M.N., and Valdez, R. (2022). A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?. Sustainability, 14. 5. (2023, January 11). Nuclear Energy and Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/nuclear-energy-and-sustainable-development.aspx.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|