Current Practices of Medication Plans in Austrian Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: An In-Depth Analysis

Author:

Vogel Johannes B.12ORCID,Neyer Magdalena12ORCID,Elsner Pascal12ORCID,Vonbank Alexander123ORCID,Plattner Thomas123,Saely Christoph H.123,Leiherer Andreas124ORCID,Drexel Heinz12456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein (UFL), 9495 Triesen, Liechtenstein

2. Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation & Treatment (VIVIT), 6800 Feldkirch, Austria

3. Department of Internal Medicine I, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria

4. Medical Central Laboratories, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria

5. Landeskrankenhaus-Betriebsgesellschaft, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria

6. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA

Abstract

A complete medication plan (MPlan) increases medication safety and adherence and is crucial in care transitions. Countries that implemented a standardized MPlan reported benefits on patients’ understanding and handling of their medication. Austria lacks such a standardization, with no available data on the issue. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the current state of all medication documentations (MDocs) at hospital admission in a population at high risk for polypharmacy in Austria. Methods: We enrolled 512 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Their MDocs and medications were recorded at admission. MDocs were categorized, whereby a MPlan was defined as a tabular list including medication name, dose, route, frequency and patient name. Results: Out of 485 patients, 55.1% had an MDoc (median number of drugs: 6, range 2–17), of whom 24.7% had unstructured documentation, 18.0% physicians’ letters and 54.3% MPlans. Polypharmacy patients did not have a MDoc in 31.3%. Crucial information as the patients’s name or the originator of the MDoc was missing in 31.1% and 20.4%, respectively. Patients with MDoc provided more comprehensive medication information (p = 0.019), although over-the-counter-medication was missing in 94.5% of MDocs. A discrepancy between the MPlan and current medication at admission existed in 64.4%. In total, only 10.7% of our patient cohort presented an MPlan that was in accordance with their current medication. Conclusion: The situation in Austria is far from a standardized MPlan generated in daily routine. Numerous MPlans do not represent the current medication and could pose a potential risk for the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2019). Medication Safety in Polypharmacy: Technical Report, World Health Organization. No. WHO/UHC/SDS/2019.11.

2. Medikationsplan: Weshalb gibt es noch keinen?;Kappeler;Prim. Hosp. Care,2021

3. Evaluation of Medication List Completeness, Safety, and Annotations;Owen;AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.,2011

4. World Health Organization (2019). Medication Safety in Transitions of Care: Technical Report, World Health Organization. WHO/UHC/SDS/2019.9.

5. Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: A repeated cross-sectional study;Moriarty;BMJ Open,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3