Comparison of Thermal and Laser-Reduced Graphene Oxide Production for Energy Storage Applications

Author:

Gómez-Mancebo M. Belén1ORCID,Fernández-Martínez Rodolfo1ORCID,Ruiz-Perona Andrea1,Rubio Verónica1,Bastante Pablo1ORCID,García-Pérez Fernando1,Borlaf Fernando1,Sánchez Miguel1,Hamada Assia2ORCID,Velasco Andrés23ORCID,Ryu Yu Kyoung2ORCID,Calle Fernando23ORCID,Bonales Laura J.4,Quejido Alberto J.1,Martínez Javier25ORCID,Rucandio Isabel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. División de Química, Departamento de Tecnología (CIEMAT), Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain

2. Instituto de Sistemas Optoelectrónicos y Microtecnología, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain

3. Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica, E.T.S.I de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain

4. Unidad de Residuos de Alta Actividad, Departamento de Energía, CIEMAT, 28040 Madrid, Spain

5. Dpto. de Ciencia de Materiales, E.T.S.I de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, UPM, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

A way to obtain graphene-based materials on a large-scale level is by means of chemical methods for the oxidation of graphite to obtain graphene oxide (GO), in combination with thermal, laser, chemical and electrochemical reduction methods to produce reduced graphene oxide (rGO). Among these methods, thermal and laser-based reduction processes are attractive, due to their fast and low-cost characteristics. In this study, first a modified Hummer’s method was applied to obtain graphite oxide (GrO)/graphene oxide. Subsequently, an electrical furnace, a fusion instrument, a tubular reactor, a heating plate, and a microwave oven were used for the thermal reduction, and UV and CO2 lasers were used for the photothermal and/or photochemical reduction. The chemical and structural characterizations of the fabricated rGO samples were performed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy measurements. The analysis and comparison of the results revealed that the strongest feature of the thermal reduction methods is the production of high specific surface area, fundamental for volumetric energy applications such as hydrogen storage, whereas in the case of the laser reduction methods, a highly localized reduction is achieved, ideal for microsupercapacitors in flexible electronics.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3