Discrepancies in Cephalometric Analysis Results between Orthodontists and Radiologists and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

Author:

Smołka Piotr1,Nelke Kamil23ORCID,Struzik Natalia4,Wiśniewska Kamila5,Kiryk Sylwia4ORCID,Kensy Julia6ORCID,Dobrzyński Wojciech7ORCID,Kiryk Jan5ORCID,Matys Jacek5ORCID,Dobrzyński Maciej4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gabinet Ortodontyczny Piotr Smołka, Pomorska 32, 50-218 Wroclaw, Poland

2. Maxillofacial Surgery Ward, EMC Hospital, Pilczycka 144, 54-144 Wroclaw, Poland

3. Health Department, Academy of Applied Sciences, Academy of Silesius, Zamkowa 4, 58-300 Walbrzych, Poland

4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preclinical Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

5. Oral Surgery Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

6. Faculty of Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

7. Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Division of Facial Abnormalities, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Abstract

Cephalometry is a crucial examination in orthodontic diagnostics and during the planning of orthognathic surgical procedures. The objective of this article was to compare cephalometric measurements conducted by different specialists and systems tailored for such measurements, as well as to evaluate the capabilities of artificial intelligence in this field. In January 2024, we conducted electronic searches in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases. In the Scopus database, the results were refined to titles, abstracts, and keywords, while in PubMed, they were narrowed down to titles and abstracts. In WoS, the results were refined only to abstracts. The search criteria were based on the following terms: (cephalometric) AND (analysis) AND (discrepancy) AND ((orthodontic) OR (radiologist)). A total of 263 articles were identified, of which 17 met the criteria and were incorporated into the review. The review allowed us to conclude that the accuracy of cephalometric measurements relied on the expertise of the operator—specialists with more experience exhibited greater precision compared to novices or individuals not specialized in orthodontics. Cephalometric measurement computer programs yielded outcomes that streamlined work processes, minimized human errors, and enhanced precision. A novel aspect involved the application of artificial intelligence, which also demonstrated high precision and a substantial reduction in working time, although its utilization still necessitates further enhancements. Further research was required to address these limitations and to optimize the incorporation of technology in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery practices.

Funder

Wroclaw Medical University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference72 articles.

1. Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Planning Using Three-Dimensional Virtual Techniques Compared with Conventional Two-Dimensional Techniques: A Systematic Review;Kesmez;J. Oral Maxillofac. Res.,2023

2. Accuracy of Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review;Alkhayer;Head Face Med.,2020

3. Cone Beam Computed Tomography—Know Its Secrets;Kumar;J. Int. Oral Health,2015

4. Comparison of Reliability in Anatomical Landmark Identification Using Two-Dimensional Digital Cephalometrics and Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Vivo;Chien;Dentomaxillofacial Radiol.,2014

5. The Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements in Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging: Cone Beam Computed Tomography versus Two-Dimensional Digital Cephalograms;Hariharan;Indian J. Dent. Res.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3