Affiliation:
1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) offers cardiorespiratory support to patients experiencing cardiac arrest. However, this technology is not yet considered a standard treatment, and the evidence on eCPR criteria and its association with survival and good neurological outcomes remains scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the overall mortality and risk factors for mortality. Moreover, we provide a comparison of demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients, including neurological outcomes and adverse events during support. Methods: This retrospective analysis included in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received eCPR and were admitted between January 2008 and June 2022 at a tertiary and trauma one-level university hospital in Austria. Results: In total, 90 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, 41 (46%) patients survived until intensive care unit discharge, and 39 (43%) survived until hospital discharge. The most common cause of cardiac arrest was myocardial infarction (42, 47%), and non-shockable initial rhythm was reported in 50 patients (56%). Of 33 survivors with documented outcomes, 30 had a good recovery as measured with Cerebral Performance Category score, 2 suffered severe disability, and 1 remained in a persistent vegetative state. Finally, multivariate analysis identified asystole as initial rhythm (HR 2.88, p = 0.049), prolonged CPR (HR 1.02, p = 0.043), and CPR on the weekend (HR 2.57, p = 0.032) as factors with a higher risk of mortality. Conclusions: eCPR-related decision-making could be additionally supported by the comprehension of the reported risk factors for mortality and severe disability. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of peri-arrest variables on outcomes, aiming to improve patient selection.
Reference57 articles.
1. Brogan, T.V., Lequier, L., MacLaren, G., Lorusso, R., Peek, G., Brodie, D., Thiagarajan, R., Vercaemst, L., and ELOS (2022). Extracorporeal Life Support: The ELSO Red Book 6th Edition, Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.
2. Rajsic, S., Breitkopf, R., Bukumiric, Z., and Treml, B. (2022). ECMO Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors for Mortality. J. Clin. Med., 11.
3. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis of mortality and complications;Rajsic;Ann. Intensive Care,2022
4. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: Evidence and implications;Abrams;Intensive Care Med.,2022
5. 2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations: Summary from the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group;Wyckoff;Resuscitation,2021