Do Statistics Show Differences between Distance Estimations of 3D Objects in the Traffic Environment Using Glances, Side View Mirrors, and Camera Display?

Author:

Trifunović Aleksandar1ORCID,Ivanišević Tijana2,Čičević Svetlana2,Simović Sreten3,Vukšić Vedran4,Slović Živana5

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

2. Academy of Professional Studies Sumadija, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia

3. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro

4. P.E. GSP Belgrade, Knjeginje Ljubice 29, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

5. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia

Abstract

The driver’s task in traffic is to evaluate traffic situations and act in accordance with the estimate. One of the most common causes of road crashes is “incorrect estimated of the traffic situation”. Correct perception of surroundings is one of the prerequisites for safe and successful driving. To investigate the mentioned issue, the authors of this paper conducted an experimental study with the aim of determining what affects the estimation of the object distance. In contrast to previous studies known from the available literature, our study presents experimental research of the estimated distance of 3D stimuli in three environments by direct observation, a rear-view mirror, and a camera display in a vehicle. One-hundred-and-sixty-four participants participated in the experiment. The research results show statistically significant differences in the estimation of the distance of 3D objects for different colors. Participants, for the largest number of stimuli, best estimate the distance from direct observation than through the rear-view mirror, while they make the most mistakes when estimating the distance of 3D objects using the camera display in a vehicle. On the other hand, in all described conditions, the respondents estimated the distance to the blue and green objects with the most significant errors.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference21 articles.

1. A developmental test of visual perception for evaluating normal and neurologically handicapped children;Frostig;Percept. Mot. Ski.,1961

2. Colours and Price Offers: How Different Price Communications Can Affect Sales and Customers’ Perceptions;Grandi;SSRN Electron. J.,2022

3. Milić, A. (2007). Traffic Psychology, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering.

4. Efficacy of haptic blind spot warnings applied through a steering wheel or a seatbelt;Chun;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2013

5. Vincent, D.S., Pitchipoo, P., and Rajakarunakaran, S. (2013, January 28–30). Elimination of blind spots for heavy transport vehicles by driver seat design. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing and Automation, Krishnankoil, India.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3