Modeling Languages for Internet of Things (IoT) Applications: A Comparative Analysis Study
-
Published:2023-03-06
Issue:5
Volume:11
Page:1263
-
ISSN:2227-7390
-
Container-title:Mathematics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mathematics
Author:
Arslan Sadik12, Ozkaya Mert3ORCID, Kardas Geylani1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. International Computer Institute, Ege University, Izmir 35100, Turkey 2. FIS Systems, Software & Functions Group, BorgWarner Co., Ltd., Izmir 35410, Turkey 3. Computer Engineering Department, Yeditepe University, Istanbul 34755, Turkey
Abstract
Modeling languages have gained ever-increasing importance for the Internet of Things (IoT) domain for improving the productivity and quality of IoT developments. In this study, we analyzed 32 different modeling languages that have been designed for IoT software development in terms of a set of requirements that were categorized into three groups: language definition, language features, and tool support. Some key findings are as follows: (1) performance is the most supported quality property (28%); (2) most languages offer a visual notation set only, while 6% provide both textual and visual notation sets; (3) most languages (88%) lack formally precise semantic definitions; (4) most languages (94%) support the physical, deployment, and logical modeling viewpoints, while the behavior, logical, and information viewpoints are rarely supported; (5) almost none of the languages enable extensibility; (6) Java (34%) and C (21%) are the most preferred programming languages for model transformation; (7) consistency (77%) and completeness (64%) are the most supported properties for the automated checking of models; and (8) most languages (81%) are not supported with any websites for sharing case studies, source code, tools, tutorials, etc. The analysis results can be useful for language engineers, practitioners, and tool vendors for better understanding the existing languages for IoT, their weak and strong points, and IoT industries’ needs in future language and modeling toolset developments.
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference141 articles.
1. Rayes, A., and Salam, S. (2019). Internet of Things from Hype to Reality: The Road to Digitization, Springer. [1st ed.]. 2. Datta, S.K., Costa, R.P.F.D., Härri, J., and Bonnet, C. (2016, January 21–24). Integrating connected vehicles in Internet of Things ecosystems: Challenges and solutions. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Coimbra, Portugal. 3. Bauer, M., Bui, N., Giacomin, P., Gruschka, N., Haller, S., Ho, E., Kernchen, R., Lischka, M., Loof, J.D., and Magerkurth, C. (2022, December 27). Internet-of-Things Architecture IoT-A Project Deliverable D1.2—Initial Architectural Reference Model for IoT. Available online: https://cocoa.ethz.ch/downloads/2014/01/1360_D1%202_Initial_architectural_reference_model_for_IoT.pdf. 4. Model-Driven Engineering for MissionCritical IoT Systems;Ciccozzi;IEEE Softw.,2017 5. Developing IoT applications: Challenges and frameworks;Udoh;IET Cyber Phys. Syst. Theory Appl.,2018
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|