Affiliation:
1. Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2. Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI), Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems (LARSyS), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
3. Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa (INESC-ID), 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract
The prospect of the energy transition is exciting and sure to benefit multiple aspects of daily life. However, various challenges, such as planning, business models, and energy access are still being tackled. Energy Communities have been gaining traction in the energy transition, as they promote increased integration of Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and more active participation from the consumers. However, optimization becomes crucial to support decision making and the quality of service for the effective functioning of Energy Communities. Optimization in the context of Energy Communities has been explored in the literature, with increasing attention to metaheuristic approaches. This paper contributes to the ongoing body of work by presenting the results of a benchmark between three classical metaheuristic methods—Differential Evolution (DE), the Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)—and three more recent approaches—the Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO), the Dandelion Optimizer (DO), and the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF). Our results show that newer methods, especially the Dandelion Optimizer (DO) and the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF), tend to be more competitive in terms of minimizing the objective function. In particular, the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF) demonstrated the capacity to obtain extremely competitive results, being on average 3% better than the second-best method while boasting between around 2× and 10× the speed of other methods. These insights become highly valuable in time-sensitive areas, where obtaining results in a shorter amount of time is crucial for maintaining system operational capabilities.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program
Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Reference53 articles.
1. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review;Bibri;Sustain. Cities Soc.,2017
2. European Commission (2024, June 11). European Climate Law. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/european-green-deal/european-climate-law_en.
3. European Climate Foundation (2024, June 11). Roadmap 2050. Available online: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en.
4. Jamei, M., Mones, L., Robson, A., White, L., Requeima, J., and Ududec, C. (2019, January 14). Meta-Optimization of Optimal Power Flow. Proceedings of the ICML 2019 Workshop on Climate Change: How Can AI Help?, Long Beach, CA, USA.
5. Caramizaru, A., and Uihlein, A. (2020). Energy communities: An overview of energy and social innovation. Scientific Analysis or Review, Policy Assessment KJ-NA-30083-EN-N, Publications Office of the European Union.