Comparison of Match Load and Wellness between Friendly and World Cup Matches in Elite Female Soccer Players

Author:

Villaseca-Vicuña Rodrigo1ORCID,Perez-Contreras Jorge23,Zabaloy Santiago4ORCID,Merino-Muñoz Pablo56ORCID,Valenzuela Luis1ORCID,Burboa Jair7,Gonzalez-Jurado Jose Antonio8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología de Pedagogía en Educación Física, Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez (UCSH), Santiago 8280354, Chile

2. Escuela de Ciencias del Deporte, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás (UST), Santiago 9170020, Chile

3. Departamento de Estudios y Producción Académica, Instituto Nacional del Fútbol (INAF), Deportes y Actividad Física, Santiago 9170020, Chile

4. Facultad de Actividad Física y Deportes, Universidad de las Flores (UFLO), Buenos Aires 1406, Argentina

5. Programa de Posgraduación en Educación Física, Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-599, Brazil

6. Núcleo de Investigación en Ciencias de la Motricidad Humana, Universidad Adventista de Chile (UNACH), Ñuble 3780000, Chile

7. Departamento de Kinesiología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación (UMCE), Santiago 7780450, Chile

8. Physical Performance and Sports Research Centre, University of Pablo de Olavide (UPO), 41013 Sevilla, Spain

Abstract

(1) Objetive: Compare the internal load (ILO), external load (ELO) and wellness (WS) between official preparation friendly matches (FM) and France 2019 women world cup (WWC) matches in female soccer players. (2) Methods: Ten field players of the Chilean national football team (age 27 ± 3.4 years, height 162.8 ± 4.32 cm, weight 60.5 ± 4.6 kg, fat percentage 24.7 ± 1.62% and muscle percentage 49.2 ± 1.63%) participated in the study. Participants were compared across three FM before the world cup and three matches of the group stages in the WWC in June 2019. Both, ELO and ILO were recorded using GPS (Catapult Sports®, 10 Hz) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE), respectively. In addition, wellness was analyzed via personal questionnaire at 24 and 48 h after match. The intra subject difference was analyzed with a Student’s t-test for related samples. (3) Results: Moderate differences were observed between WWC and FM for total and relative total distance covered [TD and TDr, respectively] (p = 0.025, ES = −0.74 and p = 0.017, ES = −0.6). In addition, a non-significant (p = 0.088; ES = −0.43) larger high-intensity distance (HSR) was also found for WWC. Likewise, greater RPE was observed in WWC (p = 0.001; ES = −1.50) when compared to FM. Finally, significantly better wellness scores were shown for FM at stress ST24h, fatigue FT48h, and muscle pain MS48h (p = 0.038; ES = 0.72, p = 0.066; ES = 0.71; and p = 0.63; ES = 0.77) when compared to WWC matches. (4) Conclusion: It was concluded that ELO and ILO were greater at WWC soccer matches, whereas WS scores were better for FM. Moreover, ILO measures (i.e., TD, HSR and TDr) were greater in WWC, which could be at least in part, be the reason behind the differences in the values reported in the wellness questionnaires at 24 and 48 h after the match.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference49 articles.

1. Relationships between internal and external match-load indicators in soccer match officials;Castillo;Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform.,2017

2. Monitoring fatigue during the in-season competitive phase in elite soccer players;Thorpe;Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform.,2015

3. Effects of COVID-19 confinement measures on training loads and the level of well-being in players from Chile women’s national soccer team;Rev. Fac. Med.,2020

4. Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: Current practice and perceptions;Akenhead;Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform.,2016

5. Velocity zone classification in elite women’s football: Where do we draw the lines?;Park;Sci. Med. Footb.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3