Comparative Analysis for Slope Stability by Using Machine Learning Methods

Author:

Nanehkaran Yaser A.1ORCID,Licai Zhu1,Chengyong Jin2,Chen Junde3ORCID,Anwar Sheraz4ORCID,Azarafza Mohammad5ORCID,Derakhshani Reza6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Information Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224002, China

2. Academy of Engineering and Technology, Yang-En University, Quanzhou 362014, China

3. Department of Electronic Commerce, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China

4. School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

5. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran

6. Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Earth slopes’ stability analysis is a key task in geotechnical engineering that provides a detailed view of the slope conditions used to implement appropriate stabilizations. In the stability analysis process, calculating the safety factor (F.S) plays an essential part in the stability assessment, which guarantees operations’ success. Providing accurate and reliable F.S can be used to improve the stability analysis procedure as well as stabilizations. In this regard, researchers used computational intelligent methodologies to reach highly accurate F.S calculations. The presented study focused on the F.S estimation process and attempted to provide a comparative analysis based on computational intelligence and machine learning methods. In this regard, the well-known multilayer perceptron (MLP), decision tree (DT), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) learning algorithms were used to predict/calculate F.S for the earth slopes. These machine learning classifiers have a strong capability predict the F.S under certain conditions for slope failures and uncertainties. These models were implemented on a dataset containing 100 earth slopes’ stabilities, recorded based on F.S from various locations in the provinces of Fars, Isfahan, and Tehran in Iran, which were randomly divided into the training and testing datasets. These predictive models were validated by Janbu’s limit equilibrium analysis method (LEM) and GeoStudio commercial software. Regarding the study’s results, MLP (accuracy = 0.901/precision = 0.90) provides more accurate results to predict the F.S than other classifiers, with good agreement with LEM results. The SVM algorithm follows MLP (accuracy = 0.873/precision = 0.85). Regarding the estimated loss function, MLP obtained a 0.29 average loss in the F.S prediction process, which is the lowest rate. The SVM, DT, and RF obtained 0.41, 0.62, and 0.45 losses, respectively. This article tried to fill the gap in traditional analysis procedures based on advanced procedures in slope stability assessments.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference48 articles.

1. Huang, Y.H. (2014). Slope Stability Analysis by the Limit Equilibrium Method, ASCE Publications.

2. Bromhead, E. (1992). The Stability of Slopes, Spon Press.

3. Design of Anchorage and Assessment of the Stability of Openings in Silty, Sandy Limestone: A Case Study in Turkey;Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.,2004

4. Abramson, L.W., Lee, T.S., Sharma, S., and Boyce, G.M. (2001). Slope Stability Concepts: Slope Stabilization and Stabilization Methods, Wiley-Interscience. [2nd ed.].

5. A novel empirical classification method for weak rock slope stability analysis;Azarafza;Sci. Rep.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3