Evaluation of Lost Circulation Material Sealing for Geothermal Drilling
Author:
Kibikas William1, Nakagawa Seiji2ORCID, Ingraham Mathew1, Bauer Stephen1ORCID, Chang Chun2, Dobson Patrick2ORCID, Kneafsey Timothy2ORCID, Samuel Abraham3
Affiliation:
1. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA 2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3. GeoEnergize LLC, La Quinta, CA 92253, USA
Abstract
Lost circulation is a pervasive problem in geothermal wells that can create prohibitive costs during drilling. The main issue with treatment is that the mechanism of plug formation is poorly understood. Here we applied two experimental approaches to characterize the clogging effectiveness of different materials. Fracture flow tests with different geometries were conducted with various individual materials and mixtures at relevant conditions. A high-temperature flow loop system was also developed to inject single- and mixed-material plugs into a gravel pack with a non-uniform geometry to compare with the fracture tests. The fracture tests revealed that single materials tended to form no plug or an unstable plug, while mixtures of materials were uniformly better at sealing fractures. Gravel pack tests at high temperatures show most of the materials are intact but degraded. The fibrous materials can create partial or unstable plugs in the gravel pack, but mixed-material plugs are far more effective at clogging. Both test types suggest that (1) mixed materials are more effective at blocking fluid flow and (2) fibrous materials seal fracture openings better, while granular materials seal inside fractures or pore throats better. Further research is needed to study the long-term stability of different plug configurations.
Funder
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Geothermal Technologies Office
Reference35 articles.
1. Lavrov, A. (2016). Lost Circulation: Mechanisms and Solutions, Gulf Professional Publishing. 2. Nugroho, W.A., Hermawan, S., Lazuardi, B.H., and Mirza, R. (2017, January 17–19). Drilling problems mitigation in geothermal environment, case studies of stuck pipe and lost circulation. Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia. 3. Blankenship, D.A., Wise, J.L., Bauer, S.J., Mansure, A.J., Normann, R.A., Raymond, D.W., and LaSala, R.J. (2005, January 25–29). Research efforts to reduce the cost of well development for geothermal power generation. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Anchorage, Alaska. 4. Cole, P., Young, K., Doke, C., Duncan, N., and Eustes, B. (2017, January 13–15). Geothermal drilling: A baseline study of nonproductive time related to lost circulation. Proceedings of the 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Lowry, T., Winn, C., Dobson, P., Samuel, A., Kneafsey, T., Bauer, S., and Ulrich, C. (2022, January 7–9). Examining the monetary and time costs of lost circulation. Proceedings of the 47th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
|
|