Design and Development Considerations of a Cyber Physical Testbed for Operational Technology Research and Education
Author:
Hosseinzadeh Salaheddin1ORCID, Voutos Dionysios1, Barrie Darren1, Owoh Nsikak1, Ashawa Moses1ORCID, Shahrabi Alireza1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Cyber Security and Networks, School of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment (SCEBE), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
Abstract
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are vital in automating complex tasks across various sectors, yet they face significant vulnerabilities due to the rising threats of cybersecurity attacks. The recent surge in cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure (CI) and industrial control systems (ICSs), with a 150% increase in 2022 affecting over 150 industrial operations, underscores the urgent need for advanced cybersecurity strategies and education. To meet this requirement, we develop a specialised cyber-physical testbed (CPT) tailored for transportation CI, featuring a simplified yet effective automated level-crossing system. This hybrid CPT serves as a cost-effective, high-fidelity, and safe platform to facilitate cybersecurity education and research. High-fidelity networking and low-cost development are achieved by emulating the essential ICS components using single-board computers (SBC) and open-source solutions. The physical implementation of an automated level-crossing visualised the tangible consequences on real-world systems while emphasising their potential impact. The meticulous selection of sensors enhances the CPT, allowing for the demonstration of analogue transduction attacks on this physical implementation. Incorporating wireless access points into the CPT facilitates multi-user engagement and an infrared remote control streamlines the reinitialization effort and time after an attack. The SBCs overwhelm as traffic surges to 12 Mbps, demonstrating the consequences of denial-of-service attacks. Overall, the design offers a cost-effective, open-source, and modular solution that is simple to maintain, provides ample challenges for users, and supports future expansion.
Reference54 articles.
1. The Cyber-Physical Systems Revolution;Serpanos;Computer,2018 2. Saeed, S., Altamimi, S.A., Alkayyal, N.A., Alshehri, E., and Alabbad, D.A. (2023). Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity Challenges for Businesses Resilience: Issues and Recommendations. Sensors, 23. 3. Ginter, A., Hale, G., Machtemes, R., Molina, D.J., Wallhof, M., and Schneider, C. (2024, June 05). 2023 Threat Report—OT Cyberattacks With Physical Consequences. Available online: https://waterfall-security.com/ot-insights-center/ot-cybersecurity-insights-center/2023-threat-report-ot-cyberattacks-with-physical-consequences/. 4. Ekisa, C., Briain, D.Ó., and Kavanagh, Y. (2021, January 10–11). An open-source testbed to visualise ics cybersecurity weaknesses and remediation strategies–a research agenda proposal. Proceedings of the 2021 32nd Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), Athlone, Ireland. 5. Smadi, A.A., Ajao, B.T., Johnson, B.K., Lei, H., Chakhchoukh, Y., and Al-Haija, Q.A. (2021). A Comprehensive survey on cyber-physical smart grid testbed architectures: Requirements and challenges. Electronics, 10.
|
|