Abstract
Linking errors in item response models quantify the dependence on the chosen items in means, standard deviations, or other distribution parameters. The jackknife approach is frequently employed in the computation of the linking error. However, this jackknife linking error could be computationally tedious if many items were involved. In this article, we provide an analytical approximation of the jackknife linking error. The newly proposed approach turns out to be computationally much less demanding. Moreover, the new linking error approach performed satisfactorily for datasets with at least 20 items.
Reference46 articles.
1. Rao, C.R., and Sinharay, S. (2007). Handbook of Statistics, Volume 26: Psychometrics, Elsevier.
2. van der Linden, W.J., and Hambleton, R.K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, Springer.
3. van der Linden, W.J. (2016). Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume 1: Models, CRC Press.
4. Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., and Rutkowski, D. (2013). A Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis, Chapman Hall/CRC Press.
5. OECD (2020). PISA 2018. Technical Report, OECD.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献