Belief in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19 Vaccines among Brazilians: A National Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Camargo Emerson Lucas Silva1ORCID,Ribeiro Caíque Jordan Nunes2ORCID,Santos Guilherme Reis de Santana3ORCID,Almeida Valdemar Silva3ORCID,Carvalho Herica Emilia Félix de1,Schneider Guilherme1ORCID,Vieira Leticia Genova1ORCID,Alvim André Luiz Silva4ORCID,Pimenta Fabiana Guerra5,Carneiro Liliane Moretti6ORCID,Batista Odinéa Maria Amorim7ORCID,Sousa Anderson Reis de8ORCID,Sousa Álvaro Francisco Lopes de910ORCID,Ventura Carla Aparecida Arena1

Affiliation:

1. Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo—USP, São Paulo 14040-902, Brazil

2. Graduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, Brazil

3. Department of Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe—UFS, Lagarto 49400-000, Brazil

4. Postgraduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil

5. Graduate Program in Nursing, Centro Universitário UNA, Contagem 32000-000, Brazil

6. Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul—UFMS, Campo Grande 79070-900, Brazil

7. Department of Nursing, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil

8. School of Nursing, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40231-300, Brazil

9. NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Center, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal

10. Institute of Teaching and Research, Sírio-Libanese Hospital, São Paulo 01308-050, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a complex challenge that demands a comprehensive approach, one that not only acknowledges legitimate concerns within communities but also actively confronts misinformation. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of belief in conspiracy theories about COVID-19 vaccines among Brazilians, seeking to understand the factors associated with this behavior. Method: Utilizing a national online survey conducted between May and August 2020, with a sample of 4247 participants, we conducted multivariate analysis to identify the independent determinants of this adherence, calculating adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. Results: It was revealed that 27.7% of participants believed in at least one conspiracy theory. Factors associated with a higher level of adherence included agreement with at least one piece of COVID-19 misinformation on social media (APR: 3.65; 95% CI: 3.07–4.34), lack of difficulty accessing leisure activities during the pandemic (APR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.85–5.24), age 50 years or older (APR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.49–1.94), absence of difficulty accessing protective measures (APR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.26–1.72), use of face masks (APR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.33–1.97), non-use of at least one traditional media source for information (APR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.26–1.72), female gender (APR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.25–1.60), and age between 30 and 49 years (APR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19–1.52). Conclusions: Our findings highlight that it is crucial to recognize that vaccine hesitancy is not merely an isolated phenomenon but often rooted in a complex interplay of social, cultural, psychological, and political factors. There is a need for multifaceted strategies to combat vaccine hesitancy, effectively address conspiracy theories, and consider the various factors associated with their prevalence.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference57 articles.

1. Global Trends from Original Research on COVID-19 and Coinfection;Moura;Rev. Prev. Infec. Saúde,2023

2. Conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 in Nigeria: Implications for vaccine demand generation communications;Wonodi;Vaccine,2022

3. (2024, February 23). Vacinometro COVID-19—Brasil. Available online: http://giscard.com.br/coronavirus/vacinometro-covid19-brasil.

4. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants;MacDonald;Vaccine,2015

5. Health belief model for coronavírus infection risk determinants;Costa;Rev. Saude Publica,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3