Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance

Author:

Kharouf Naji12ORCID,Pedullà Eugenio3ORCID,Plotino Gianluca4ORCID,Jmal Hamdi5ORCID,Alloui Mohammed-El-Habib1,Simonis Philippine2,Laquerriere Patrice6ORCID,Macaluso Valentina7,Abdellatif Dina8,Richert Raphaël910,Haikel Youssef1211,Mancino Davide1211ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France

2. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France

3. Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95128 Catania, Italy

4. Private Practice, Grande Plotino & Torsello—Studio di Odontoiatria, 00187 Rome, Italy

5. ICube Laboratory, UMR 7357 CNRS, Mechanics Department, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France

6. Institute Pluridisciplinaire Hubert CURIEN (IPHC), 67000 Strasbourg, France

7. ESTA, School of Business and Technology, 90000 Belfort, France

8. Department of Endodontics, Alexandria University, Alexandria 5424041, Egypt

9. Hospices Civils de Lyon, PAM Odontologie, 69100 Lyon, France

10. Laboratoire de Mécanique des Contacts et Structures, UMR 5259 CNRS/INSA Lyon, 69100 Lyon, France

11. Pôle de Médecine et Chirurgie Bucco-Dentaire, Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred premolars were divided into one control group (Gcontr) (n = 10) and three experimental groups, according to the post-endodontic restoration (n = 30), G1, restored using composite, G2, restored using single fiber post and G3, restored using multifilament fiberglass posts (m-FGP) without post-space preparation. Each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of coronal cavity configuration (n = 10): G1O, G2O, and G3O with occlusal (O) cavity configuration; G1MO, G2MO, and G3MO with mesio-occlusal (MO); and G1MOD, G2MOD, and G3MOD with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD). After thermomechanical aging, all the specimens were tested under compression load, and failure mode was determined. FEA and WA supplemented destructive tests. Data were statistically analyzed. Irrespective of residual tooth substance, G1 and G2 exhibited lower fracture resistance than Gcontr (p < 0.05), whereas G3 showed no difference compared to Gcontr (p > 0.05). Regarding the type of restoration, no difference was highlighted between G1O and G2O, G1MO and G2MO, or G1MOD and G2MOD (p > 0.05), whereas G3O, G3MO, and G3MOD exhibit higher fracture resistance (p < 0.05) than G1O and G2O, G1MO and G2MO, and G1MOD and G2MOD, respectively. Regarding cavity configuration: in G1 and G2, G1O and G2O exhibited higher fracture resistance than G1MOD and G2MOD, respectively (p < 0.05). In G3, there was no difference among G3O, G3MO and G3MOD (p > 0.05). No difference was found among the different groups and subgroups regarding the failure mode. After aging, premolars restored with multifilament fiberglass posts demonstrated fracture resistance values comparable to those of an intact tooth, irrespective of the different type of cavity configuration.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3