Abstract
There has been an upsurge concerning the concept and application of “co-management” in the governance of natural resources in Bangladesh in recent years. Notwithstanding the popularity of co-management, however, the overall approach to implementation has been overtly technical in nature; and there has been limited attention to sustainability dynamics. This article aims to explore aspects policy and practice withinco-management based on several purposely selected cases in the coastal forest zones of Bangladesh. It also identifies the major challenges and issues concerning its sustainability. The lessons generated by this study may be relevant to both policy makers and practitioners. A qualitative research approach was adopted with empirical data collection methods including key informant interviews, focus group discussions, documentary research, and unstructured personal observation. The article begins with a recapitulation of the concept of co-management and its associations with sustainability, followed by an overview of the major co-management practices in Bangladesh. The discussion subsequently raises lessons learned and key issues relating to sustainability, including: the need for sorting out land-related tenurial complications and institutions used in co-management; unequal awareness of the concept of co-management and varying levels of participation of community organizations; the political interface and accountability of co-management institutions; issues of “ownership” at the community level; and the role of “external” support and facilitation. As a recently developed concept and practice, co-management seems to be rapidly taking root and displaying signs of gradual consolidation in Bangladesh. Considerable progress has been made in terms of required policy and legislative reforms, community level institution building, and a degree of change in the mindset of the government agencies to accommodate and nurture co-management. However, numerous issues (e.g., tenurial rights, effective community participation, equity, political dynamics, adequate financial support, accountability, and transparency) still need to be resolved if sustainability is to be fully achieved and satisfy the hopes and needs of local communities both now and in the future.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference107 articles.
1. FAO Forestry Paper No. 147. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, 2006.
2. Species composition and forest structure in tropical moist deciduous forest of Bangladesh—A case study in Thakurgaon;Zaman;Arab. J. Geosci.,2011
3. DeCosse, P.J. Assessing the Capacity and Progress of Forest Co-management Organizations. Protected Area Co-Management Where People and Poverty Intersect: Lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh, 2012.
4. Ahmed, A.U., Siddiqi, N.A., and Choudhuri, R.A. Vulnerability of forest ecosystems of Bangladesh to climate change. Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change for Bangladesh, 1999.
5. Produced for United States Agency for International Development by ECODIT. Bangladesh Environment Sector Assessment and Strategic Analysis, 2010.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献