Abstract
Worldwide, artificial nourishments are being considered as one of the main coastal erosion mitigation measures. However, this solution is not permanent, since the natural removal of sediments that occurs after the sand deposition leads to the need of re-nourishment projects; thus, its performance and longevity dependent on several design parameters (placement site and extension alongshore, frequency, and volume, etc.) In this work, a methodological approach for cost–benefit assessment is applied to analyze the performance of artificial nourishments from a physical and economical point of view, by analyzing the effectiveness of different scenarios. The study was developed considering two study areas: a hypothetical situation (generic study area) and a real coastal stretch (Barra-Vagueira, located in the Portuguese west coast). The findings show the complexity in defining the best nourishment option, being dependent on the wave climate, site specific conditions, and main goal of the intervention. The proposed cost–benefit approach allows one to obtain and compare the physical and economic performance of artificial nourishments to mitigate coastal erosion, aiding the decision-making processes related to coastal planning and management.
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference64 articles.
1. The state of the world’s beaches;Luijendijk;Sci. Rep.,2018
2. NRC (1995). National Research Council: Beach Nourishment and Protection, The National Academic Press.
3. ASBPA (2007). Shore Protection Assessment: How Beach Nourishment Projects Work, Shore Protection Assessment; US Army Corps of Engineers.
4. Initial Spreading of a Mega Feeder Nourishment: Observations of the Sand Engine Pilot Project;Ruessink;Coast. Eng.,2016
5. Coelho, C. (2005). Riscos de Exposição de Frentes Urbanas para Diferentes Intervenções de Defesa Costeira. [PhD Thesis, University of Aveiro]. (In Portuguese).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献