Affiliation:
1. Department of Care & Ethics, Faculty of Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
2. Global Market Access Solutions (GMAS), Charlotte, NC 28202, USA
3. Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Public University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands
Abstract
Healthcare is a huge business sector in many countries, focusing on the social function of delivering quality health when people develop illness. The system is essentially financed by public funds based on the solidarity principle. With a large financial outlay, the sector must use economic evaluation methods to achieve better efficiency. The objective of our study was to evaluate and to understand how health economics is used today, taking Belgium as an example of a high-income country. The evaluation started with a historical view of healthcare development and ended with potential projections for its future. A literature review focused on country-specific evaluation reports to identify the health economic methods used, with a search for potential gaps. The first results indicated that Belgium in 2021 devoted 11% of its GDP, 17% of its total tax revenue, and 30% of the national Social Security Fund to health-related activities, totalizing EUR 55.5 billion spending. The main health economic method used was a cost-effectiveness analysis linked to budget impact, assigning reimbursable monetary values to new products becoming available. However, these evaluation methods only impacted at most 20% of the money circulating in healthcare. The remaining 80% was subject to financial regulations (70%) and budgeting (10%), which could use many other techniques of an economic analysis. The evaluation indicated two potentially important changes in health economic use in Belgium. One was an increased focus on budgeting with plans, time frames, and quantified treatment objectives on specific disease problems. Economic models with simulations are very supportive in those settings. The other was the application of constrained optimization methods, which may become the new standard of practice when switching from fee-for-service to pay-per-performance as promoted by value-based healthcare and value-based health management. This economic refocusing to a more constrained approach may help to keep the healthcare system sustainable and affordable in the face of the many future challenges including ageing, climate change, migration, pandemics, logistical limitations, and financial instability.
Reference122 articles.
1. Skidelsky, R. (2020). What’s Wrong with Economics, Yale University Press.
2. Dasgupta, P. (2007). Economics, a Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.
3. Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the Welfare State, Oxford university Press. [5th ed.].
4. Varian, H. (1992). Micro-Economic Analysis, W.W. Norton & Company. [3rd ed.].
5. Mill, A. (2016). Economics 101, Adams Media.