Affiliation:
1. Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS), Wageningen University and Research, 6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands
2. Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract
To develop an adequate ethical framework for a futureproof zoo, we have to employ what I would call a ‘bifocal’ view, in which zoo animals are seen simultaneously as individuals in need of specific care and as members of a species in need of protection. From such a bifocal view, the zoo’s policy should aim to strike a fair, morally acceptable balance between its effort to ensure the welfare of individual animals and its obligation to contribute to species conservation. I will argue that the prospects of the zoo to achieve such a balance are promising. Since early 21st century, zoos have made serious and sustained efforts to ensure and enhance animal welfare. The zoo’s huge animal welfare concerns are reflected in the development of animal enrichment programs and the increased use of training technics. At the same time, the zoo’s contribution to species conservation has also improved considerably. Zoos have found solutions for the problems created by their lack of space, such as innovative enclosure designs, specialization, regional and global cooperation, the interactive exchange of in situ and ex situ populations, and the shift away from large charismatic mammals towards smaller species. Zoos have also improved their conservation performance by broadening their conservationist role to include research, training, education, awareness campaigns, and direct financial and technical support for in situ projects. I will occasionally illustrate certain developments using examples drawn from ARTIS Zoo, the fifth oldest zoo in the world, located in the centre of my hometown Amsterdam.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference34 articles.
1. Gruen, L. (2014). The Ethics of Captivity, Oxford University Press.
2. Ecological Ethics in Captivity: Balancing Values and Responsibilities in Zoo and Aquaium Research under Rapid Global Change;Minteer;ILAR,2013
3. The One Plan Approach: The Philosophy and Implementation of CBSG’s Approach to Integrated Species Conservation Planning;Byers;WAZA Mag.,2013
4. Braverman, I. (2015). Wild Life. The Institution of Nature, Stanford University Press.
5. Norton, B., Hutchins, M., Maple, T., and Stevens, E. (1995). Ethics on the Ark, Smithsonian Institute Press.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献