Towards a Futureproof Zoo

Author:

Keulartz Jozef12

Affiliation:

1. Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS), Wageningen University and Research, 6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands

2. Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

To develop an adequate ethical framework for a futureproof zoo, we have to employ what I would call a ‘bifocal’ view, in which zoo animals are seen simultaneously as individuals in need of specific care and as members of a species in need of protection. From such a bifocal view, the zoo’s policy should aim to strike a fair, morally acceptable balance between its effort to ensure the welfare of individual animals and its obligation to contribute to species conservation. I will argue that the prospects of the zoo to achieve such a balance are promising. Since early 21st century, zoos have made serious and sustained efforts to ensure and enhance animal welfare. The zoo’s huge animal welfare concerns are reflected in the development of animal enrichment programs and the increased use of training technics. At the same time, the zoo’s contribution to species conservation has also improved considerably. Zoos have found solutions for the problems created by their lack of space, such as innovative enclosure designs, specialization, regional and global cooperation, the interactive exchange of in situ and ex situ populations, and the shift away from large charismatic mammals towards smaller species. Zoos have also improved their conservation performance by broadening their conservationist role to include research, training, education, awareness campaigns, and direct financial and technical support for in situ projects. I will occasionally illustrate certain developments using examples drawn from ARTIS Zoo, the fifth oldest zoo in the world, located in the centre of my hometown Amsterdam.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference34 articles.

1. Gruen, L. (2014). The Ethics of Captivity, Oxford University Press.

2. Ecological Ethics in Captivity: Balancing Values and Responsibilities in Zoo and Aquaium Research under Rapid Global Change;Minteer;ILAR,2013

3. The One Plan Approach: The Philosophy and Implementation of CBSG’s Approach to Integrated Species Conservation Planning;Byers;WAZA Mag.,2013

4. Braverman, I. (2015). Wild Life. The Institution of Nature, Stanford University Press.

5. Norton, B., Hutchins, M., Maple, T., and Stevens, E. (1995). Ethics on the Ark, Smithsonian Institute Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3