Abstract
Grounded in a social scientific research approach, the present case study traces the shift in the German nuclear regulatory culture from prevention to preparedness, the latter of which builds upon decision support systems for nuclear emergency management. These systems integrate atmospheric dispersion models for tracing radioactive materials released accidentally from nuclear facilities. For atmospheric dispersion modelers and emergency managers, this article provides a critical historical perspective on the practical, epistemic, and organizational issues surrounding the use of decision support systems for nuclear emergency management. This perspective suggests that atmospheric dispersion models are embedded within an entire assemblage of institutions, technologies, and practices of preparedness, which are challenged by the uniqueness of each nuclear accident.
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference65 articles.
1. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea
2. Nuclear Emergency Response: Atomic Priests or an International SWAT Team?;Schmid,2013
3. Being “Post-Fukushima”: Divergent Understandings of Sociotechnical Risk;Kinsella,2015
4. Germany’s Energy Transition—A Collective Project for the Future,2011
5. The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy