Efficacy of Bomas (Kraals) in Mitigating Livestock Depredation in Maasai Mara Conservancies, Kenya

Author:

Wakoli Elizabeth12,Syallow Dorothy Masiga3ORCID,Sitati Evans4,Webala Paul W.2ORCID,Ipara Hellen5,Finch Tabitha6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Natural Resources, Egerton University, Egerton-Njoro P.O. Box 536-20115, Kenya

2. Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok P.O. Box 861-20500, Kenya

3. Department of Agroforestry, Environmental Studies and Integrated Natural Resource Management, University of Kabianga, Kericho P.O. Box 2030-20200, Kenya

4. Mara Siana Conservancy, Narok P.O Box 724-20500, Kenya

5. Department of Wildlife Management, University of Eldoret, Eldoret P.O. Box 1125-30100, Kenya

6. Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada

Abstract

Livestock depredation is a major conservation challenge globally, causing significant economic losses to pastoralists and threatening large carnivore species outside protected areas. Our study investigated the temporal and spatial distribution of livestock depredation incidences, carnivore species associated with livestock depredation, and assessed mitigation measures in Maasai Mara Conservancies in Southern Kenya. Using daily monitoring of livestock depredation cases, we made comparisons between livestock attacks occurring in predator-proof bomas and those with traditional kraals. A total of 305 livestock depredation incidents were recorded between January and December 2021, translating to a total tally of 1411 livestock maimed or killed. Most livestock depredation incidents occurred during the day (59%) as opposed to night (41%), but this difference was not significant. Livestock depredation incidents in the nighttime occurred mostly inside traditional kraals (34%) and occurred the least in predator-proof kraals (2%). Lions were responsible for more livestock attacks in the grazing fields compared with leopards, hyenas, and wild dogs. Hyenas were more daring and attacked livestock inside traditional bomas relative to lions and leopards. Our study concludes that predator-proof bomas are more effective in minimizing livestock depredation and can be embraced as a sound intervention for human–carnivore co-existence in communities’ wildlife conservation areas.

Funder

Rufford Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Approaches to Human-Wildlife Conflict Management in and around Chebera-Churchura National Park, Southern Ethiopia;Acha;Asian J. Conserv. Biol.,2015

2. Human-Wildlife Conflict in Kafta-Sheraro National Park, Northern Ethiopia;Berihun;World J. Zool.,2016

3. Phase-dependent climate–predator interactions explain three decades of variation in neonatal caribou survival;Schaefer;J. Anim. Ecol.,2016

4. Human-wildlife conflict under climate change;Abrahms;Science,2021

5. Effectiveness of non-lethal predator deterrents to reduce livestock losses to leopard attacks within a multiple-use landscape of the Himalayan region;Naha;PeerJ,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3